[R-SIG-Mac] Building from source problems.
Simon Urbanek
simon.urbanek at r-project.org
Thu Oct 29 15:51:03 CET 2009
Rolf,
you could save yourself a lot of trouble if you just looked at CRAN --
you'd notice that I have actually released an official 2.10.0 binary
just for you ;).
As for your woes - I suspect you have outdated Xcode tools, but
unfortunately you appear to not have read my e-mail so I can only
speculate.
Cheers,
Simon
On Oct 28, 2009, at 20:21 , Rolf Turner wrote:
>
> QUESTION 1:
> ===========
>
> Yesterday I sent out a cri de coeur in respect of not being
> able to build R 2.10.0 from source on my Mac (OS X 10.4.11).
>
> Simon Urbanek informed me that I could get a working R 2.10.0
> from http://r.research.att.com/ which I duly did. That went
> O.K.
>
> Then today, because of another problem that I encountered (see
> below) I decided to go back to R 2.9.2. I retrieved the
> tar file from the ``Source code of older versions of R'' and
> went through the ./configure and make routine. Blow me down,
> but didn't I get the same error that I got when trying to make
> version 2.10.0:
>
>> building package 'tcltk'
>> mkdir ../../../library/tcltk
>> mkdir ../../../library/tcltk/R
>> mkdir ../../../library/tcltk/exec
>> mkdir ../../../library/tcltk/po
>> mkdir ../../../library/tcltk/man
>> making init.d from init.c
>> making tcltk.d from tcltk.c
>> making tcltk_unix.d from tcltk_unix.c
>> gcc -std=gnu99 -I../../../../include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/
>> local/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/sw/include -I/usr/local/
>> include -fPIC -g -O2 -c init.c -o init.o
>> gcc -std=gnu99 -I../../../../include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/
>> local/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/sw/include -I/usr/local/
>> include -fPIC -g -O2 -c tcltk.c -o tcltk.o
>> gcc -std=gnu99 -I../../../../include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/
>> local/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/sw/include -I/usr/local/
>> include -fPIC -g -O2 -c tcltk_unix.c -o tcltk_unix.o
>> In file included from tcltk_unix.c:23:
>> ../../../../include/R_ext/eventloop.h:73: warning: 'struct timeval'
>> declared inside parameter list
>> ../../../../include/R_ext/eventloop.h:73: warning: its scope is
>> only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you
>> want
>> gcc -std=gnu99 -dynamiclib -Wl,-headerpad_max_install_names -
>> mmacosx-version-min=10.4 -undefined dynamic_lookup -single_module -
>> multiply_defined suppress -L/sw/lib -L/usr/local/lib -o tcltk.so
>> init.o tcltk.o tcltk_unix.o -L/usr/local/lib -ltcl8.5 -L/usr/local/
>> lib -ltk8.5 -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lX11 -Wl,-weak-lXss -lXext -
>> L../../../../lib -lR -dylib_file libRblas.dylib:../../../../lib/
>> libRblas.dylib -lintl -liconv -lc -Wl,-framework -Wl,CoreFoundation
>> /usr/libexec/gcc/i686-apple-darwin8/4.0.1/libtool: for architecture
>> x86_64 object: /usr/local/lib/libtk8.5.dylib malformed object
>> (unknown load command 7)
>> make[4]: *** [tcltk.so] Error 1
>> make[3]: *** [all] Error 1
>> make[2]: *** [R] Error 1
>> make[1]: *** [R] Error 1
>> make: *** [R] Error 1
>
> Simon told me that the error that arose when I tried to make 2.10.0
> was
> due to trying to build a 64 bit version under a too-ancient version of
> Mac OS X. Is the 2.9.2 release configured to produce a 64 bit
> version?
> I ***thought*** I had installed 2.9.2 from source, but maybe not ....
>
> Is there any way I can tell it ***not*** to go for a 64-bit version?
> (Surely there must be, since the r.research.att web site provides a
> version which runs under Mac OS X 10.4.11.)
>
> QUESTION 2:
> ===========
>
> The reason that I decided to go back to R 2.9.2 was that I tried to
> install the contributed package spatstat (version 1.17.0) from source
> and got an error:
>
> gcc -arch i386 -std=gnu99 -I/Library/Frameworks/R.framework/
> Resources/include -I/Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Resources/
> include/i386 -I/usr/local/include -fPIC -mtune=core2 -g -O2 -c
> Kborder.c -o Kborder.o
> Kborder.c:1: error: bad value (core2) for -mtune= switch
> make: *** [Kborder.o] Error 1
> ERROR: compilation failed for package 'spatstat'
>
> I thought this error must have resulted from the upgrade to 2.10.0.
> However
> when I finally succeeded in backing off to 2.9.2 (by getting a
> binary from
> the r.research.att site) I got exactly the same error under 2.9.2.
>
> What is this error all about? What can I do about it? Is there any
> flag
> I can set for configure (???) that will get rid that -mtune=core2 in
> the call to gcc? What is ``mtune'' all about? What does ``core2''
> mean?
>
> Sheesh! :-)
>
> Thanks for any enlightenment.
>
> cheers,
>
> Rolf Turner
>
>
>
> ######################################################################
> Attention:\ This e-mail message is privileged and confid...{{dropped:
> 9}}
>
> _______________________________________________
> R-SIG-Mac mailing list
> R-SIG-Mac at stat.math.ethz.ch
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mac
>
>
More information about the R-SIG-Mac
mailing list