Hi,

    I emailed Bob O'Hara from the OpenBugs site to originally ask this
question and he referred me to you. I'm currently using WinBugs for an
introduction to Bayesian statistics course, and was suggested to try using
the BRugs package to write sensitivity analysis scripts. However, the model
is running around 4 times slower using the BRugs interface compared to
WinBugs. Is this typically the case? In general are there types of models
that are either better off running in WinBugs, or if I'm determined to do it
in R I should be prepared to let it run overnight? I made sure I was running
the most current versions of R and BRugs.

Thank you for your time,

-Robin Jeffries
M.S. Candidate
Department of Biostatistics
University of California, Los Angeles

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]


