I find this topic very interesting as well.

Juan, are you referring to R to perform your analysis?

Clint, a Poisson point process takes into account the time that events
occur,  doesn't it?  Juan did mention nothing about the time if I'm not
wrong,  does it matter?
On Jul 31, 2013 11:19 PM, "Clint Bowman" <clint@ecy.wa.gov> wrote:

> Isn't this amenable to a Poisson point process <
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/**Poisson_process<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisson_process>
> >?
>
> See Konisky, et al, 2013, "Strategic Placement of Air Polluters: An
> Application of Point Pattern Models".
>
>
> Clint Bowman                    INTERNET:       clint@ecy.wa.gov
> Air Quality Modeler             INTERNET:       clint@math.utah.edu
> Department of Ecology           VOICE:          (360) 407-6815
> PO Box 47600                    FAX:            (360) 407-7534
> Olympia, WA 98504-7600
>
>         USPS:           PO Box 47600, Olympia, WA 98504-7600
>         Parcels:        300 Desmond Drive, Lacey, WA 98503-1274
>
> On Wed, 31 Jul 2013, Juan Manuel Becerra wrote:
>
>  Hi
>>
>> I'm trying to make a model to estimate the number of roberys. I know the
>> address of these people and the point on the map where they live. I have a
>> sample of all the country, in different cities, different zones. The
>> variable can be set to 0,1,2 .....,and it is distributed as a poisson.
>> Right now I'm using data from the population density from a raster of
>> european environment agency. For now I want only estimate the number of
>> roberys, depending on population density, or moving window arround the
>> people live. In future I would like to include more variables raster-based
>> style.
>>
>> I have read that the models used in these cases are GWR, but in a book
>> specifically speaks about MWR as a good method to estimate in places where
>> you did not have data to make the regression (this is my situation). I
>> think GWR need points near the value estimate to give a good estimate. In
>> my case i don't have these points to estimate because I want to estimate
>> only considering adaptations of independent variables (...focal by kernel,
>> or others ).
>>
>> I've read about GWmodel, gwrr, spgwr .... but I don't have a very clear
>> idea about what is the best way in my case. Is there any package that has
>> implemented MWR?, It is possible that I'm wrong, and I can use whith GWR
>> raster values in areas without sample to estimate?. A good
>> recommendation?... i'm new in this king of regressions.
>>
>> I posted the same question in gis secction of stackoverflow.
>>
>> http://gis.stackexchange.com/**questions/67443/moving-window-**
>> regression-mwr-in-r<http://gis.stackexchange.com/questions/67443/moving-window-regression-mwr-in-r>
>>
>>         [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> R-sig-Geo mailing list
>> R-sig-Geo@r-project.org
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/**listinfo/r-sig-geo<https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo>
>>
>>
> ______________________________**_________________
> R-sig-Geo mailing list
> R-sig-Geo@r-project.org
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/**listinfo/r-sig-geo<https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo>
>

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

