Hi all, 

on the journal paper "Geographically weighted regression-modelling spatial non-stationarity" by Chris Brunsdon, Stewart Fotheringham, and Martin Chariton, 1998, page 433, they argue that when d=h, exp(-0.5d^2/h^2) returns 0.05.
But, when d=h, I get this value to be  exp(-0.5)
[1] 0.6065307
which is not even close to them. I cannot say its a typo,as it is Chris Brunsdon's in joural. 
Roger, had you noticed this before?
Mike
	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

