Thanks for the answer, Marcellino

2011/9/1 <marcelino.delacruz@upm.es>

> Hi,
> I dont know if there is an equivalent method to MSE for the density of
> weighted points or the same method would apply, but for the question on
> the default bandwith in smooth.ppp, you can see that smooth.ppp calls
> density.ppp, and here, if not sigma is given, it takes sigma as  1/8 of
> the minimum windows side. From the code of density.ppp:
>
>
>  w <- x$window
>        sigma <- (1/8) * min(diff(w$xrange), diff(w$yrange))
>
> Cheers,
>
> Marcelino
>
>
> Con fecha 31/8/2011, "Mathieu Rajerison" <mathieu.rajerison@gmail.com>
> escribió:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >
> >I know how to determine an optimal bandwidth for the kernel density of
> >points using mean suared error method as possible with splancs package.
> >
> >But I was wondering if there was an equivalent method for the density of
> >weighted points as performed by spatstat::smooth.ppp
> >Also,how is bandwidth chosen by default when launching smooth.ppp(X)?
> >
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Mathieu
> >
> >       [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >R-sig-Geo mailing list
> >R-sig-Geo@r-project.org
> >https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo
>

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

