
Hi R-floks:
 
Working in geoRglm, it shows me, according to AIC criterion, that the non-spacial model describes the process in a better way. It's the first time that I'm facing up to.
 
These are my results:
OP2003Seppos.AICnonsp-OP2003Seppos.AICsp
#[1] -4

(OP2003Seppos.lf0.p<-exp(OP2003Seppos.lf0$beta)/(1+exp(OP2003Seppos.lf0$beta))) #P non spatial
#[1] 0.9717596

(OP2003Seppos.lf.p<-exp(OP2003Seppos.lf$beta)/(1+exp(OP2003Seppos.lf$beta)))      #P spatial
#[1] 0.9717596

It must what have an important influence at kriging, because it shows as following:
 
OP2003Sepposbin.krig<-glsm.krige(OP2003Seppos.tune,loc=OP2003Seppospro.pred.grid,bor=OP2003Sepposbor)
#glsm.krige: Prediction for a generalised linear spatial model 
#There are 50 or mode advices (use warnings() to see them)
#> warnings()
#Warning messages:
#1: In asympvar(kpl.result$predict, messages = FALSE) ... :
#  value of argument lag.max is not suffiently long
#2: In asympvar(kpl.result$predict, messages = FALSE) ... :
#  value of argument lag.max is not suffiently long

I don't understand the warnings. Help me, please.
 		 	   		  
	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

