[R-sig-Geo] using the same legend for different scenarios in sf plots

[Facundo Muñoz]

In addition to Edzer's answer, I'd suggest considering producing a
single faceted plot with the 7 maps with a common legend, which might be
a more straightforward way to present a comparison of scenarios.

See, for instance, an example at
https://umr-astre.pages.mia.inra.fr/presentations/2019_rfsa_lsd/#21

ƒacu.-


On 19/02/2020 16:05, Paulo Flores Ribeiro wrote:
> Thanks, Edzer. I used «breaks = seq (from = 0, to = 0.4, by = 0.01)» and 
> it works beautifully!
> Best regards,
> PauloFR
>
> Às 14:10 de 19-02-2020, Edzer Pebesma escreveu:
>> With the breaks argument you can specify the numbers at which colors break.
>>
>> On 2/19/20 3:05 PM, Paulo Flores Ribeiro wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> I want to compare the spatial distribution of a variable in 7 different
>>> scenarios by running the same plot code successively 7 times (within sf
>>> package), each time changing the values of the variable for each
>>> scenario. In each run, I copy-paste the map into a word document. In the
>>> end, I want to visually compare the 7 maps, but for that I need the
>>> scale range of the legend values to be the same on the seven maps
>>> (including the colour ramp).
>>> How to force the scale interval (and the corresponding colour ramp) to
>>> be the same on the seven maps, within the sf package?
>>> Thanks,
>>> PauloFR
>>>
>>>
>>> 	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> R-sig-Geo mailing list
>>> R-sig-Geo using r-project.org
>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> R-sig-Geo mailing list
>> R-sig-Geo using r-project.org
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo
> 	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> _______________________________________________
> R-sig-Geo mailing list
> R-sig-Geo using r-project.org
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]