[R-sig-Geo] Intensity Estimation Methods

Cenk İÇÖZ cicoz at anadolu.edu.tr
Fri Dec 15 13:23:27 CET 2017


Thanks a lot.
I did superimpose the original pattern to pixel images of intensities. With adaptive smothing intensity higher zones are too narrowed.
Also the differences of intensities are getting higher in the study region. The fixed bandwidth choosen with bw.ppl( ) in spatstat give me a better Picture. This is my opinion and also this is in my case . I use this bandwidth as a global bandwidth for adaptive smoothing.


-----Original Message-----
From: Rolf Turner [mailto:r.turner at auckland.ac.nz]
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 11:14 PM
To: Cenk İÇÖZ <cicoz at anadolu.edu.tr>
Cc: r-sig-geo at r-project.org; Adrian.Baddeley at curtin.edu.au; Ege Rubak <rubak at math.aau.dk>
Subject: Re: [R-sig-Geo] Intensity Estimation Methods

On 15/12/17 01:01, Cenk İÇÖZ via R-sig-Geo wrote:
> Hello list,,
>
> I have a spatial point pattern . I am trying to estimate its intensity
> both with a fixed bandwidth and  with an adaptive bandwidth. How could
> I compare the goodness of these two fits? I mean are there any things
> like mse, aic or any other criteria??? I want to compare the
> difference between the estimated intensity and the original pattern's
> intensity.

I think that the following fortune (fortunes::fortune(340)) might be
relevant:

> Bandwidth selection is an unresolved (and possibly unsolvable) problem
> in smoothing, so you're perfectly justified in trying/choosing an
> arbitrary value if it produces good pictures!
>    -- Adrian Baddeley (answering a user's question about the choice of
>       smoothing parameter when using the density.ppp() function from the
>       spatstat package)
>       private communication (March 2013)

I am cc-ing to the man himself to see if he has further comment.

cheers,

Rolf Turner

--
Technical Editor ANZJS
Department of Statistics
University of Auckland
Phone: +64-9-373-7599 ext. 88276


________________________________

Bu elektronik posta ve onunla iletilen bütün dosyalar sadece yukarıda isimleri belirtilen kişiler arasında özel haberleşme amacını taşımakta olup gönderici tarafından alınması amaçlanan yetkili gerçek ya da tüzel kişinin kullanımına aittir. Eğer bu elektronik posta size yanlışlıkla ulaşmışsa, elektronik postanın içeriğini açıklamanız, kopyalamanız, yönlendirmeniz ve kullanmanız kesinlikle yasaktır. Bu durumda, lütfen mesajı geri gönderiniz ve sisteminizden siliniz. Anadolu Üniversitesi bu mesajın içerdiği bilgilerin doğruluğu veya eksiksiz olduğu konusunda herhangi bir garanti vermemektedir. Bu nedenle bu bilgilerin ne şekilde olursa olsun içeriğinden, iletilmesinden, alınmasından ve saklanmasından sorumlu değildir. Bu mesajdaki görüşler yalnızca gönderen kişiye aittir ve Anadolu Üniversitesinin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir.

This electronic mail and any files transmitted with it are intended for the private use of the people named above. If you are not the intended recipient and received this message in error, forwarding, copying or use of any of the information is strictly prohibited. Any dissemination or use of this information by a person other than the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal. In this case, please immediately notify the sender and delete it from your system. Anadolu University does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information included in this message. Therefore, by any means Anadolu University is not responsible for the content of the message, and the transmission, reception, storage, and use of the information. The opinions expressed in this message only belong to the sender of it and may not reflect the opinions of Anadolu University.



More information about the R-sig-Geo mailing list