[R-sig-Geo] How to “smooth” a raster map

Julian Burgos julian at hafro.is
Mon Jun 29 12:05:46 CEST 2015


You are right Robert.  In addition to the statistical reasons you mention,
Thiago should also consider that interpolating at higher resolutions the
output resolution of the model introduces assumptions about the nature of
small-scale processes.  In the case of bilinear interpolation for example,
that the target variable (rice yield) varies linearly in space at scales
below 0.5 degrees.  This assumption it is likely completely wrong (as it
is the case for most types of ecological data).  As you said, the model
may only be designed to capture large scale processes, or the input data
may not be available at higher resolutions and therefore we cannot know
what happens at smaller scales.

Julian
--
Julian Mariano Burgos, PhD
Hafrannsóknastofnun/Marine Research Institute
Skúlagata 4, 121 Reykjavík, Iceland
Sími/Telephone : +354-5752037
Bréfsími/Telefax:  +354-5752001
Netfang/Email: julian at hafro.is

> Julian,
>
> A measured response, with an answer but crucially your comments further
> down. I really hope Thiago reads them, as they are of central importance.
>
> Even for display, nobody should ever hide the actual resolution of the
> information being displayed (even if others do this in error). Of course
> the authors of spatial packages in R will never provide default displays
> that intentionally deceive the viewer.
>
> If the half degree output for the model was what it was designed to
> provide, nobody can know the fitted values at higher resolution without
> re-running the model itself at higher resolution. The input data to the
> model may not be available at this resolution.
>
> More important, the model output almost certainly is accompanied by
> measures of the prediction uncertainly, so that each half-degree cell
> value is actually a summary of the predicted distribution.
>
> Trying to smooth only a central tendency measure of these distributions
> deterministically is creating complete chaos - you will not know what the
> resampled cell distributions are. That is why creating a "nice map" is a
> really bad idea, see also:
>
> http://www.markmonmonier.com/how_to_lie_with_maps_14880.htm
>
> The pixelation is actually your friend, because it is communicating the
> support of the model fitted values visually.
>
> Again, thanks to Julian for a measured and very rapid response.
>
> Roger
>
> On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, Julian Burgos wrote:
>
>> Hi Thiago,
>> If the output of your model has a resolution of 0.5 degrees, you will
>> have
>> to do some kind of interpolation to get the "smooth" look that you are
>> looking for.  If you are only doing this for visualization purposes, you
>> can use the resample function and do a simple bilinear interpolation.
>> The
>> function goes something like this:
>>
>> new.raster <- b[[2]] # Create a new raster (with same extent, etc. as
>> your
>> original raster)
>> res(new.raster) <- 0.25 # Change the resolution.. select whatever value
>> you want... small values require more time
>> resample(b[[2]], new.raster, method="bilinear")
>> levelplot(new.raster)
>>
>> Now, remember that when you do this you are in a way cheating.  You are
>> showing a model output at much higher resolution that the output really
>> is.  But again, if it is only to have a pretty picture then it is fine.
>> On the other hand, if you are going to use the new.raster for other
>> analysis or as input for other models, then things get complicated.
>>
>> All the best,
>>
>> Julian
>> --
>> Julian Mariano Burgos, PhD
>> Hafrannsóknastofnun/Marine Research Institute
>> Skúlagata 4, 121 Reykjavík, Iceland
>> Sími/Telephone : +354-5752037
>> Bréfsími/Telefax:  +354-5752001
>> Netfang/Email: julian at hafro.is
>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> I am trying to create a map from raster data. The file came from a crop
>>> model, with resolution of 0.5 degree. Even when I disaggregate it (i.e.
>>> increase spatial resolution), the map looks really pixelated. I am
>>> trying
>>> to make it look better.
>>> My current code produces this image: http://i.stack.imgur.com/WssPy.png
>>>
>>> where I would like to "smooth" the data, by supressing the pixelated
>>> look.
>>> Some other visualization programs do this automatically, so I guess it
>>> should not be hard to reproduce using R.
>>>
>>> For example, this is the same file plotted using Panoply:
>>> http://i.stack.imgur.com/jXYI7.png
>>>
>>> It doesn't look absolutely smooth, but at least it doesn't have the
>>> pixelated look neither. How to achieve a similar result in R?
>>>
>>> This is the code to reproduce my problem:
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> library(RCurl)
>>> library(rasterVis)
>>>
>>> # Go to temp dir and download file - approx. 1.7M
>>> old <- setwd(tempdir())
>>>
>>> # download raster and shapefile
>>> download.file('https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/27700634/yield.nc',
>>> 'yield.nc', method='curl')
>>> download.file('https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/27700634/southern.zip',
>>> 'southern.zip', method='curl')
>>> unzip('southern.zip', exdir='.')
>>>
>>> # load southern Brazil shapefile
>>> mapaSHP <- shapefile('southern.shp')
>>>
>>> # load brick
>>> b <- brick('yield.nc', level=16)
>>>
>>> # create color scheme
>>> mycols <-
>>> rasterTheme(region=colorRampPalette(brewer.pal(9,'Greens'))(100))
>>>
>>> # use second brick layer to plot map
>>> levelplot(b[[2]], margin = FALSE, main = "Rice yield in tons/ha",
>>> par.settings = mycols) +
>>> layer(sp.lines(mapaSHP, lwd=0.8, col='darkgray'))
>>>
>>> # return to your old dir
>>> setwd(old)
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Thanks in advance for any input,
>>> --
>>> Thiago V. dos Santos
>>> PhD student
>>> Land and Atmospheric Science
>>> University of Minnesota
>>> http://www.laas.umn.edu/CurrentStudents/MeettheStudents/ThiagodosSantos/index.htm
>>> Phone: (612) 323 9898
>>>
>
> --
> Roger Bivand
> Department of Economics, Norwegian School of Economics,
> Helleveien 30, N-5045 Bergen, Norway.
> voice: +47 55 95 93 55; fax +47 55 95 91 00
> e-mail: Roger.Bivand at nhh.no



More information about the R-sig-Geo mailing list