[R-sig-Geo] kriging

Dave Depew ddepew at sciborg.uwaterloo.ca
Wed Jun 18 15:10:20 CEST 2008


hi Tom,
That was my impression from reading some introductory texts... I'll have 
to see how the mgcv package fits the polynomial function to the 
data...it isn't clear to me at first glance how it is accomplished.
Many thanks for your advice.

Dave

Tomislav Hengl wrote:
> Dear Dave,
>
> I separate fitting of the deterministic (trend) and residual part of the universal kriging model all
> the time. Adding OK of residuals to the trend is fine, as long as the regression model is estimated
> using GLS (but many do it even if they use only OLS; the difference is often minor). Both KED and RK
> give the same results, but in order to run KED, you need to have the residuals, so you always have
> to model the trend-part anyway.
>
> See some code at: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-geo/2008-April/003433.html 
>
> In future, please keep the whole history of correspondence.
>
> Tom Hengl
> http://spatial-analyst.net 
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Depew [mailto:ddepew at sciborg.uwaterloo.ca] 
> Sent: dinsdag 17 juni 2008 14:57
> To: T.Hengl at uva.nl
> Cc: r-sig-geo at stat.math.ethz.ch
> Subject: re:kriging
>
> Thanks Tom,
> I've been able to fit a polynomial function to the data quite well. The 
> residuals are behaving (i.e normal distribution and no skewness of 
> variance). I'm assuming this means that I could krige the residuals 
> (Ordinary K?) and then add the trend back to the predicted residual 
> grid? I realize that I won't be able to place confidence limits on the 
> predictions, but the data is primarily to show that we might be able to 
> use GPS hydroacoustic signals to show macrophyte cover and estimate the 
> standing crop. I'm still a newbie when it comes to the theory involved 
> in kriging, but I think I am familiar with the basics...the variogram of 
> the residuals is a nice spherical model (i.e. it reaches a sill about 
> 50% or so above the nugget, and there is little scatter). I am assuming 
> (perhaps wrongly) that the residuals may be modelled with a variogram 
> and then kriged...
>
>
>




More information about the R-sig-Geo mailing list