[R-sig-Geo] GWR

[CARMEN RODRIGUEZ]

I insist on GWR. To run a GWR model I'm using both R and GWR 3.0. Comparing 
the estimated coefficients for an adaptative bisquare kernel in R with the 
results for an adaptative kernel in GWR 3.0 (which is supposed to be a 
bisquare function too), differences are very big. I check the bandwidths and 
they are not that different (as I understand, in R the adaptative bandwidth 
is expressed as a percentage of observations, while in GWR 3.0 the bandwidth 
is the number of observations itself). But anyway, the estimated 
coefficients shouldn't be so different, should they?

Thank you.

_________________________________________________________________
Descubre la descarga digital con MSN Music. Más de un millón de canciones.