[R-sig-Geo] GWR

CARMEN RODRIGUEZ carm_rodrig at hotmail.com
Wed Nov 29 10:57:14 CET 2006

I insist on GWR. To run a GWR model I'm using both R and GWR 3.0. Comparing 
the estimated coefficients for an adaptative bisquare kernel in R with the 
results for an adaptative kernel in GWR 3.0 (which is supposed to be a 
bisquare function too), differences are very big. I check the bandwidths and 
they are not that different (as I understand, in R the adaptative bandwidth 
is expressed as a percentage of observations, while in GWR 3.0 the bandwidth 
is the number of observations itself). But anyway, the estimated 
coefficients shouldn't be so different, should they?

Thank you.

Descubre la descarga digital con MSN Music. Más de un millón de canciones.

More information about the R-sig-Geo mailing list