Michael,

When I google for "bloomberg R", I get a very long result list.
http://www.google.com/search?q=bloomberg+R
At the top, you'll also find a little link "More results from
stat.ethz.ch »<http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=+site:stat.ethz.ch+bloomberg+R&ei=1zGGS-GwIYON_Abcq43SDw&sa=X&oi=forum_cluster&resnum=1&ct=more-results&ved=0CAsQrQIwAA>"
which will forward you to 223 results from this mailing list about bloomberg
and R.

I wonder a bit, if you cannot use google, how do you want to use bloomberg,
R, Matlab or even manage my financial account ??? !!!!

Kind regards,
Ulrich

On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:30 AM, julien cuisinier
<J_Cuisinier@hotmail.com>wrote:

> Michael,
>
>
>
> I really do not think this is a way you'll get anyone sympathy or help on
> this list.
>
> Several points on your recent messages posted here:
>
> 1. you're sending to a R list a message of how to automate a process
> involving BB & Matlab....not a good idea, if you have Matlab you are paying
> the hefty fees that comes with it...hence you have access to their customer
> services which would be much better placed than this list to help you.
>
> 2. Bear in mind that R is free & that any help you may receive through this
> list is also free & provided by people who have their own job/agenda (i.e.
> unlike Matlab's support, they are not sitting & paid to solve your
> problems). Hence any question asked should be as concise and focused as
> possible and you should have clearly searched beforehand, which was far from
> obvious from your recent posts...
>
> 3. Everyone on this list has a limited time capital to spend asking
> questions and not posting properly (I will not pretend it never happened to
> me...), you've been clearly dilapidating this capital of late. People are
> not there to solve your prbls and spare you some time, rather to try helping
> you on a voluntary basis if you're facing a blocking point in your research
> / development. Asking people to solve your Bloomberg process for uploading
> from Excel is none of this list problem. Again if you have bloomberg station
> you have access to their customer support which should be the people to
> answer your question.
>
> 4. Reacting the way you did below will definitely alienate you most of this
> list participants. You would have made some research into the  previous
> posts, you would have seen Brian is quite an intensive contributor and often
> provides helpful guidance when it is properly asked. Again this is a free
> help, so you have to adapt to it no the other way around.
>
> 5. "if you don't add value to the discussion" >> which discussion?
>
>
> Sorry for this direct tone, but as Brian said this list has a quite
> interesting high signal to noise ratio which makes all its value.
> Thank you for your collaboration in keeping it this way.
>
>
> Rgds,
> Julien
>
>
>
> On Feb 24, 2010, at 4:44 PM, Michael Jungle wrote:
>
>
>> PLEASE, PLEASE DON'T ASSUME PEOPLE DON'T GOOGLE.
>> And please keep your volume down if you don't add value to the discussion.
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://n4.nabble.com/Is-there-a-way-to-automate-Bloomberg-tp1566526p1567628.html
>> Sent from the Rmetrics mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> R-SIG-Finance@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-finance
>> -- Subscriber-posting only. If you want to post, subscribe first.
>> -- Also note that this is not the r-help list where general R questions
>> should go.
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> R-SIG-Finance@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-finance
> -- Subscriber-posting only. If you want to post, subscribe first.
> -- Also note that this is not the r-help list where general R questions
> should go.
>



-- 
Kind regards,
Ulrich B. Staudinger

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

