thanks Dirk. I guess exact reproduction is not possible in R, probably due
to different rng.

On 2/1/08, Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org> wrote:
>
>
> On 1 February 2008 at 19:55, tom soyer wrote:
> | simulate.garch of S+. I assume that there is no simulate.garch in R. I
> am
>
> Well you could always test your assumption.  A quick
>
>        > RSiteSearch("simulate garch")
>
> yields 14 hits. While the first two are off, the rest leads you the right
> way.  That said, there are no canned replacement functions that exactly
> redo
> the S+ code.
>
> You could try to write some -- IIRC Insightful created some compatibility
> layers, and folks like Paul Gilbert who have been living between S+ and R
> for
> at least a decade even have RNGs that create identical sequences to get
> the
> same quasi-random numbers.
>
>
>
> --
> Three out of two people have difficulties with fractions.
>



-- 
Tom

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

