[R-SIG-Finance] Adding transaction fees to Return.portfolio

[Ilya Kipnis]

This is correct.

On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Robert Wages <robert at rwages.com> wrote:

> Thanks, Ilya.  I assume then I would have to subtract the custom
> transaction costs from the  relevant “return” list object entries to
> generate a cost-adjusted portfolio return for each period.  Is that right?
>
>
>
> *Robert C Wages*
>
> USA Mobile: +1 717 618 2828
>
> robert at rwages.com
>
>
>
> *From:* Ilya Kipnis [mailto:ilya.kipnis at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 10, 2016 3:53 PM
> *To:* Robert Wages <robert at rwages.com>
> *Cc:* r-sig-finance at r-project.org
> *Subject:* Re: [R-SIG-Finance] Adding transaction fees to Return.portfolio
>
>
>
> Essentially, given a change in weights over any period, you can apply your
> own custom transaction costs to the difference in weights.
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Ilya Kipnis <ilya.kipnis at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Robert,
>
> There's actually a way to compute turnover with Return.portfolio, with
> verbose = TRUE. It returns end of period weights, and beginning of period
> weights, so the turnover can be computed as beginWeights - lag(endWeights).
>
> -Ilya
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Robert Wages <robert at rwages.com> wrote:
>
> Return.portfolio is an easy function to use to calculate the aggregate
> performance of a portfolio that is rebalanced on a regular basis or that
> has
> a custom weighting scheme on the same periodicity of returns.  I cannot
> find
> any provision in Return.portfolio, however, for incorporating the
> transaction costs for the rebalancing in the portfolio.  The resulting
> portfolio performance would  seem to be high to the extent of the
> transaction costs.
>
>
>
> On the other hand, running strategies in Quantstrat on individual
> securities
> (or groups of securities) allows one to take into account estimated trading
> costs to generate somewhat realistic performance estimates.  Quantstrat,
> however, does not seem to have any readily accessible functions to balance
> a
> portfolio of securities within a portfolio limit.  Previous related
> discussions seem to suggest the only solution is to write custom order
> sizing functions to include in the strategy's rules.
>
>
>
> I may be able to figure how to write custom functions in Quantstrat to do
> this after a lot of brain damage, or alternatively my own version of
> Return.portfolio, but I thought I should check with the community to see if
> there are any better suggestions for this.  Given that many investment
> strategies rely on portfolio rebalancing under some set of rules, as
> opposed
> to buying and selling individual securities on the basis of rules, I would
> be surprised if I were the first person to wonder about this.
>
>
>
> Robert C Wages
>
> USA Mobile: +1 717 618 2828
>
> robert at rwages.com <mailto:robert at rwages.com>
>
>
>
>
>         [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> _______________________________________________
> R-SIG-Finance at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-finance
> -- Subscriber-posting only. If you want to post, subscribe first.
> -- Also note that this is not the r-help list where general R questions
> should go.
>
>
>
>
>

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]