[R-SIG-Finance] Antwort: [R-sig-finance] VaR

Matthias.Koberstein at hsbctrinkaus.de Matthias.Koberstein at hsbctrinkaus.de
Tue Mar 3 12:59:40 CET 2009

```Hi Christofer,

I think the analogy is allowed if you assume normal distributions for the
assets.
Since then the VaR is dependent on the volatility.
The variance of two random variables (combined assets in this case) is
given by

Var(x+y)= E((x+y)^2) - E(x+y)^2

which transforms to
Var( x+y) = Var(x) + Var(y) + 2  * Covariance(x, y)

So it all depends on the covariance of x to y.
To give it a better feel this can be expressed in Correlation

Var(x+y)= Var(x) + Var(y) + 2 * Vol(x) * Vol(y) * Correlation

To better see  the effect throw some weights in w1, and w2 which combine to
one.
Then

Var( w1 x + w2 y)= Var(x) w1^2 + Var(y) w2^2 + 2 * w1 * w2 * Vol(x) * Vol
(y) * Correlation

the volatility used to estimate VaR is the square root of the variance.
So you see that if correlation is 1 VaR is not sub-additive.

Another point is if the distributions you use for the assets are not the
same,
the VaR can not even been combined easily but you have to find the combined
distributions of the assets in the portfolio (which can be quite painful).

I hope that helps. All the best

Matthias

**** Ressourcen schonen, weniger drucken - Think before you print! ****

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Diese E-Mail sowie eventuelle Anhänge enthalten vertrauliche und / oder
rechtlich geschützte Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat
sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte
sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese Mail. Das unerlaubte Kopieren
oder Speichern sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser E-Mail sind nicht
gestattet.

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and / or
privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient or have
destroy this e-mail . Any unauthorized copying, storing, disclosure or
distribution of the contents of this e-mail is strictly forbidden.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
HSBC Trinkaus & Burkhardt AG
Sitz: Düsseldorf, Königsallee 21/23, 40212 Düsseldorf, Handelsregister:
Amtsgericht Düsseldorf HRB 54447
Mitglieder des Vorstands: Andreas Schmitz (Sprecher), Paul Hagen, Dr. Olaf
Huth, Carola Gräfin v. Schmettow
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Dr. Sieghardt Rometsch

Bogaso
<bogaso.christofe
r at gmail.com>                                               An
Gesendet von:               r-sig-finance at stat.math.ethz.ch
r-sig-finance-bou                                       Kopie
nces at stat.math.et
hz.ch                                                   Thema
[R-SIG-Finance] [R-sig-finance]
Fax-Deckblatt:              VaR
HSBCTuB
03.03.2009 12:24

I frequently hear Value at risk i.e. VaR is not a coherent risk measure
because, sum of VaR for two individual assets may be LOWER than VaR of
portfolio consists of that two aseets i.e. VaR may not be sub-additive.
However when I calculate VaR for general assets like Equity, commodity etc,
I see that VaR is actually sub-addtive i.e. portfolio VaR is always less
than sum of individuals, which is reported as "diversification benefit".
Can
anyone give me a particular example why VaR is not sub-additive?

Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/VaR-tp22306743p22306743.html
Sent from the Rmetrics mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
R-SIG-Finance at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-finance
-- Subscriber-posting only.
-- If you want to post, subscribe first.

```