[R-SIG-Finance] portfolio optimization questions
Brian G. Peterson
brian at braverock.com
Wed Jun 18 04:30:35 CEST 2008
Alexander Moreno wrote:
> I have a general finance question, rather than an R-specific question. In
> trading currencies, should the weights always add up to 1, or 0, or can
> they add up to anything? What determines this?
If you have no leverage (long-only), and are fully invested, then your
weighting vector will add to 1. If you are 1:1 long/short, then your
weighting vector would add to 0, if you are 50% levered long-only, then
you would have a weighting vector total of 1.5, and so on. Make sense?
> Also, I have an Splus nuopt
> question. If anyone knows a better place to post this, it would be
> appreciated, but in the meantime I'll ask it here. In NuOPT, when I set
> mu.target for solveQP to be very low (used as in page 9 of introduction to
> modern portfolio optimization with NuOPT, S-PLUS, and S+Bayes), I see poor
> portfolio returns, but if I set it to be high, I get an error message
> <<SIMPLE 193>> Error in solve():
> <<NUOPT 2>> infeasible(linear constraints and variable bounds)
This most likely means that there is no portfolio with the target mu.
More information about the R-SIG-Finance