[R-SIG-Finance] Problem with garch (tseries)
Adrian Trapletti
a.trapletti at swissonline.ch
Sat Aug 19 14:20:39 CEST 2006
Volatility of financial time series often exhibits a very persistent
behaviour which is not well represented by plain GARCH. Many models have
been developped to address this issue among others IGARCH and long
memory GARCH. My personal point of view is that this almost unit root or
long memory behaviour is due to the fact that many structural breaks
(exogenous shocks) of different size occur randomly from time to time.
Appropriately simulated time series of such structural break models
cannot be distinguished from long memory GARCH for example.
To give you some input to your question: A very robust solution is to
use simple running averages or medians (or other robust measures of
location) of recent realized volatility. There is a lot of recent
research about estimating realized volatility, one very simple measure
is to use the range (high minus low of the period) appropriately scaled
to represent standard deviations. According to my experience forecasts
based on these simple models are often better than forecasts based on
complex statistical time series models, in particular if the loss
function is not a statistical one, but an economical one.
Best regards
Adrian
>Message: 6
>Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 17:50:22 -0700 (PDT)
>From: michael mathews <muckjail at yahoo.com>
>Subject: Re: [R-SIG-Finance] Problem with garch (tseries)
>To: Patrick Burns <patrick at burns-stat.com>
>Cc: r-sig-finance at stat.math.ethz.ch
>Message-ID: <20060819005022.79785.qmail at web38912.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
>As I mentioned to Joe off list I am dealing with natural Gas prices at
>houston ship channel. While I could assemble a longer price series it
>seems that nat gas has entered into a new price/volatility regime in
>the last two years which I think makes using older data somewhat
>problematic.
>
>If garch does not like "small" samples what would be a robust way to
>estimate the volatility?
>
>thanks for your input
>
>michael
>
More information about the R-SIG-Finance
mailing list