[R-sig-eco] Doing repeated measures on a randomized block design
Dixon, Philip M [STAT]
pd|xon @end|ng |rom |@@t@te@edu
Mon Jun 17 01:27:26 CEST 2019
Rick,
There are (at least) two ways to set up a model for your experiment. The difference is a detail of your sampling. The two most likely schemes are:
1) Each time you sampled, you went to the same branch (or perhaps same leaf). Here, the repeated measurements are on the branch, not the tree. Exposure (N/S) is characteristic of the branch. In terms of the model variables, a branch is identified by combination of tree and exposure. This leads to the traditional between/within repeated measures design. If you assume compound symmetry (nested random effects), the lmer model would be FvFm ~ Tree + Exposure + Date + Date:Exposure + (1|Tree:Exposure)
2) Each time you sampled, you went to different branches. Now the only level of repeatedness is the tree. Now there is one observation per branch; each is characterized by exposure and date. The model is simply a 2 way factorial inside blocks. If you wanted to set up something like a compound symmetry model, you would have tree and observation as the random effects. Since there are only 4 trees, I would treat trees as fixed. The lmer model is FvFm ~ Tree + Exposure + Date + Date:Exposure
With 18 dates, I would stongly advice against a compound symmetry (split plot in time) model. There is probably some structure to the correlations. This means using lme() with something like a corAR1() correlation structure. You can add that to either model, (to get CS+AR(1) for the first option or AR(1) in blocks for the second). Or you could a "just an AR(1)" model for the first option by replace (1|Tree:Exposure) with the corAR1().
Best,
Philip Dixon
More information about the R-sig-ecology
mailing list