[R-sig-eco] help
Thierry Onkelinx
thierry.onkelinx at inbo.be
Thu May 19 09:55:16 CEST 2016
Dear Baoping,
You could standardize the weight by stage. That would remove the
confounding between weight and stage.
Best regards,
ir. Thierry Onkelinx
Instituut voor natuur- en bosonderzoek / Research Institute for Nature and
Forest
team Biometrie & Kwaliteitszorg / team Biometrics & Quality Assurance
Kliniekstraat 25
1070 Anderlecht
Belgium
To call in the statistician after the experiment is done may be no more
than asking him to perform a post-mortem examination: he may be able to say
what the experiment died of. ~ Sir Ronald Aylmer Fisher
The plural of anecdote is not data. ~ Roger Brinner
The combination of some data and an aching desire for an answer does not
ensure that a reasonable answer can be extracted from a given body of data.
~ John Tukey
2016-05-19 2:39 GMT+02:00 lbp at njau.edu.cn <lbp at njau.edu.cn>:
> Now I have difficulty to choose between two modelling approach. Here is th
> story. To examine the clutch size laid by a parasitic wasp into caterpillar
> hosts which varies in age and size, we exposed individual larvae of three
> stages, after individually weighed, to parasitism, and the number of wasps
> emerged from each host (brood size) was recorded. Because host size and
> stage are mutually counfounding factors, the older the bigger, I have two
> modelling choices to separate the effect of stage and size. One is to make
> separate analyses, first analyzing the effct of stages in a model without
> the variable size, and then analyze the effect of the size under each stgae
> (several models); another approach is to make one analysis, put stage and
> size together in the same model to evaluate their separate and interacted
> effects on brood size. For the later approach, the variable size actualy
> contains the inflormation about the stage, thus violating the independence
> assumation. I am won!
> dering which appraoch is approriate.
>
> Thanks for any help.
>
> Baoping
>
>
>
>
> E-mail: lbp at njau.edu.cn
> Phone: 86 (25) 84396394
>
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> _______________________________________________
> R-sig-ecology mailing list
> R-sig-ecology at r-project.org
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-ecology
>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
More information about the R-sig-ecology
mailing list