[R-sig-eco] species richness, GLM and negative values

Martin Weiser weiser2 at natur.cuni.cz
Wed Oct 29 20:32:18 CET 2014


Ludovico Frate píše v St 29. 10. 2014 v 16:27 +0100:
> Dear all,I'am trying to fit a very simple linear model. I am analyzing the differences in the number of species (DS) found in several permanent plots in two year of observations.
>  Firstly, I have calculated the differences per plot (i.e. number of species in Plot 1 in Time A - number of species in Plot 1 in Time B and so on for all the plots).Secondly, those differences were tested for deviation from zero by means of a linear model
> M2<-lm(DC~1, data = gransasso)summary(M2)E2<-residuals(M2)qqnorm(E2, pch = 19, col = "blue"); qqline(E2, col = "red")
> The qqnorm has shown that residuals were not normally distributed, thus I need to use a GLM. However GLM (poisson family) does not work with negative values (DS has negative values).I've tried to add a constant value to these differences (i.e. +100) but the result is misleading  since I am testing for deviation from zero.
> Do you have any suggestions?
> Regards,Ludovico
> 
>                                                                                                                              
> Ludovico
> Frate
> 
> PhD student (University of Molise - Italy)
> Environmetrics Lab
> http://www.distat.unimol.it/STAT/environmetrica/organico/collaboratori/ludovico-frate-1
> Department of Biosciences and Territory - DiBT
> Universit del Molise.
> Contrada Fonte
> Lappone, 
> 86090 -  Pesche (IS)
> ITALIA.
> Cel: ++39
> 3333767557
> Fax: ++39 (0874) 404123
> E-mail ludovico.frate at unimol.it
> ludovicofrate at hotmail.it
>  		 	   		  
> 	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> 
> _______________________________________________
> R-sig-ecology mailing list
> R-sig-ecology at r-project.org
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-ecology

Hi Ludovico,

correct me if I am wrong, but I think you want to say something like:
"In X out of Y plots, number of species did substantially (statistically
significantly?) changed".
For this, I would separate the plots where number of species is bigger
and those where opposite is true in the second census and perform
binomial test:
binom.test(x=abs(difference), n=more.species.i.e.bigger.of.the.numbers,
p=0.5) per each plot. Maybe you need better p (something like mean
probability of species to disappear,...)

HTH.
Martin






-- 

------------------------------
Pokud je tento e-mail součástí obchodního jednání, Přírodovědecká fakulta 
Univerzity Karlovy v Praze:
a) si vyhrazuje právo jednání kdykoliv ukončit a to i bez uvedení důvodu,
b) stanovuje, že smlouva musí mít písemnou formu,
c) vylučuje přijetí nabídky s dodatkem či odchylkou,
d) stanovuje, že smlouva je uzavřena teprve výslovným dosažením shody na 
všech náležitostech smlouvy.



More information about the R-sig-ecology mailing list