[R-sig-eco] Retrieving canonical coefficients and correlation coefficients according to ter Braak using vegan package cca() function
Jari Oksanen
jari.oksanen at oulu.fi
Thu Jun 14 21:09:40 CEST 2012
Joris,
On 14/06/2012, at 17:39 PM, Joris Meys wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> I get results that differ from the table given by ter Braak. I can explain
> the differences in sign (that's normal, as the solution of cca is defined
> up to the sign), and I can believe there would be small differences as
> we're talking different ways of estimation, but the canonical coefficients
> for the second axis differ substantially.
>
> My question :
>
> - Did I use the correct methods to extract what ter Braak calls "canonical
> coefficients" and "correlation coefficients"?
> - is there a logical explanation for the big difference in some results ?
>
I haven't checked that paper, and can't do that for several days. However, one essential difference in "canonical" coefficients between Canoco and vegan::cca is that Canoco standardizes all constraining variables to unit variance whereas vegan uses unstandardized variables. Does it help if you use
Model <- cca(hs.spec ~ ., data = scale(hs.ev))
?
Cheers, Jari Oksanen
--
Jari Oksanen, Dept Biology, Univ Oulu, 90014 Finland
jari.oksanen at oulu.fi, Ph. +358 400 408593, http://cc.oulu.fi/~jarioksa
More information about the R-sig-ecology
mailing list