[R-pkg-devel] Tool for advanced man/doc page check?

Ghislain Durif gh|@|@|n@dur|| @end|ng |rom en@-|yon@|r
Thu Jul 10 15:19:04 CEST 2025


Hi again,

Thanks for the responses!

@Jan van der Laan our package is unix-only so I did no try to check it 
with winbuilder.

@Etienne Bacher `checkhelper::find_missing_tags()` does actually find 
some issue, even running with the release version of R.

@Duncan Murdoch I was indeed running the check with the release version 
of R, I'll check with the development version.

Thanks again,

Best regards,

Ghislain Durif
-------------------------------------------
Research engineer -- CNRS
BioComputing Hub, LBMC, ENS Lyon (France)
Webpage: https://gdurif.perso.math.cnrs.fr

On 10/07/2025 12:13, Ghislain Durif wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am the maintainer of a package for which we have done a major 
> refactoring (work in progress, can be found here 
> <https://github.com/getkeops/keops/tree/fix_rkeops_v2_keops_v2.3/rkeops>).
>
> Upon my last resubmission to CRAN, some issues regarding some man 
> pages (that I obviously missed) were found, e.g. function doc without 
> a \value{} tag, or examples for (purposely) unexported functions.
>
> These issues were not raised during package check (with or without 
> `--as-cran` flag).
>
> The code base is quite large, and I would be very interested in any 
> tool that could help me check the man pages more thoroughly than a 
> package check ?
>
> I know about `devtools::check_man()` but it does not find the issues 
> that I am mentioning.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Best regards,
>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 840 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-package-devel/attachments/20250710/782b190a/attachment.sig>


More information about the R-package-devel mailing list