[R-pkg-devel] DESCRIPTION file corrections for accepted package
Duncan Murdoch
murdoch@dunc@n @end|ng |rom gm@||@com
Sun Oct 27 11:49:05 CET 2024
On 2024-10-27 6:03 a.m., Gianmarco Alberti wrote:
> Dear R Package Developers,
> I am seeking guidance regarding a situation with my package 'chisquare'
> (version 1.1) on CRAN.
>
> Current situation:
>
> 1. The package was submitted and (automatically) accepted to CRAN (version
> 1.1) after thorough local testing and complete devtools checks
> (check_win_oldrelease(), check_win_release(), check_win_devel())
>
> 2. After acceptance, I received a request to make formatting changes to the
> DESCRIPTION file by November 2, 2024:
> -Remove version specifications for graphics and stats in Imports
> -Update R version dependency format from R (>= 4.0.0) to R (>= 4.0)
>
> 3. Upon attempting to submit these formatting changes, I received a warning
> about "Insufficient package version (submitted: 1.1, existing: 1.1)". I am
> well aware that this warning typically indicates the need to increment the
> version number for new submissions of existing packages, as per CRAN
> policies.
>
> This creates a procedural challenge:
> -I need to make the requested DESCRIPTION file changes to retain the package
> -The changes are purely formatting-related, not functional (all checks pass)
> -I cannot submit without changing the version number
> -However, incrementing the version number seems disproportionate for
> formatting changes.
>
> I would greatly appreciate guidance on the proper way to handle this
> situation.
> What is the recommended approach for submitting DESCRIPTION file formatting
> corrections for an already-accepted package, given that incrementing the
> version number might seem a bit disproportionate?
>
> Thank you for your time and assistance.
The simplest thing is to just update the version. Use 1.1.1 if you
don't want to go to 1.2.
Duncan Murdoch
More information about the R-package-devel
mailing list