[R-pkg-devel] How to get arbitrary precise inputs from R for an Rcpp package?

[Khue Tran]

Thank you for the suggestion, Denes, Vladimir, and Dirk. I have indeed
looked into Rmpfr and while the package can interface GNU MPFR with R
smoothly, as of right now, it doesn't have all the functions I need (ie.
eigen for mpfr class) and when one input decimals, say 0.1 to mpfr(), the
precision is still limited by R's default double precision.

Thank you for the note, Dirk. I will keep in mind to send any future
questions regarding Rcpp to the Rcpp-devel mailing list. I understand that
the type used in the Boost library for precision is not one of the types
supported by SEXP, so it will be more complicated to map between the cpp
codes and R. Given Rmpfr doesn't provide all necessary mpfr calculations
(and embarking on interfacing Eigen with Rmpfr is not a small task), does
taking input as strings seem like the best option for me to get precise
inputs?

Sincerely,
Khue

On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 8:29 AM Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd using debian.org> wrote:

>
> Hi Khue,
>
> On 19 July 2024 at 06:29, Khue Tran wrote:
> | I am currently trying to get precise inputs by taking strings instead of
> | numbers then writing a function to decompose the string into a rational
> | with the denominator in the form of 10^(-n) where n is the number of
> | decimal places. I am not sure if this is the only way or if there is a
> | better method out there that I do not know of, so if you can think of a
> | general way to get precise inputs from users, it will be greatly
> | appreciated!
>
> That is one possible way. The constraint really is that the .Call()
> interface
> we use for all [1] extensions to R only knowns SEXP types which map to a
> small set of known types: double, int, string, bool, ...  The type used by
> the Boost library you are using is not among them, so you have to add code
> to
> map back and forth. Rcpp makes that easier; it is still far from automatic.
>
> R has packages such as Rmpfr interfacing GNU MPFR based on GMP. Maybe that
> is
> good enough?  Also note that Rcpp has a dedicated (low volume and friendly)
> mailing list where questions such as this one may be better suited.
>
> Cheers, Dirk
>
> [1] A slight generalisation. There are others but they are less common /
> not
> recommended.
>
> --
> dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd using debian.org
>

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]