[R-pkg-devel] Notes while a new R package submission

Mahadi Hassan mhn@yem@cu@@t@t @end|ng |rom gm@||@com
Mon Jul 8 12:09:35 CEST 2024


Hello everyone
I need your attention. I have developed a new R package and submitted it to
CRAN. In return main i got two notes they are:

* using log directory 'd:/RCompile/CRANincoming/R-devel/drglm.Rcheck'
* using R Under development (unstable) (2024-07-05 r86875 ucrt)
* using platform: x86_64-w64-mingw32
* R was compiled by
    gcc.exe (GCC) 13.2.0
    GNU Fortran (GCC) 13.2.0
* running under: Windows Server 2022 x64 (build 20348)
* using session charset: UTF-8
* checking for file 'drglm/DESCRIPTION' ... OK
* checking extension type ... Package
* this is package 'drglm' version '1.0.1'
* package encoding: UTF-8
* checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
Maintainer: 'MHNayem <mhnayem.cu.stat using outlook.com>'

New submission
* checking package namespace information ... OK
* checking package dependencies ... OK
* checking if this is a source package ... OK
* checking if there is a namespace ... OK
* checking for hidden files and directories ... OK
* checking for portable file names ... OK
* checking whether package 'drglm' can be installed ... OK
* checking installed package size ... OK
* checking package directory ... OK
* checking for future file timestamps ... OK
* checking 'build' directory ... OK
* checking DESCRIPTION meta-information ... OK
* checking top-level files ... OK
* checking for left-over files ... OK
* checking index information ... OK
* checking package subdirectories ... OK
* checking code files for non-ASCII characters ... OK
* checking R files for syntax errors ... OK
* checking whether the package can be loaded ... OK
* checking whether the package can be loaded with stated dependencies ... OK
* checking whether the package can be unloaded cleanly ... OK
* checking whether the namespace can be loaded with stated dependencies ... OK
* checking whether the namespace can be unloaded cleanly ... OK
* checking loading without being on the library search path ... OK
* checking use of S3 registration ... OK
* checking dependencies in R code ... OK
* checking S3 generic/method consistency ... OK
* checking replacement functions ... OK
* checking foreign function calls ... OK
* checking R code for possible problems ... OK
* checking Rd files ... OK
* checking Rd metadata ... OK
* checking Rd line widths ... OK
* checking Rd cross-references ... OK
* checking for missing documentation entries ... OK
* checking for code/documentation mismatches ... OK
* checking Rd \usage sections ... OK
* checking Rd contents ... OK
* checking for unstated dependencies in examples ... OK
* checking installed files from 'inst/doc' ... OK
* checking files in 'vignettes' ... OK
* checking examples ... [257s] NOTE
Examples with CPU (user + system) or elapsed time > 10s
                user system elapsed
drglm          93.50  14.34  107.82
drglm.multinom 78.65  13.28   91.89
big.drglm      26.61   1.75   28.36
make.data      25.07   1.78   26.84
* checking for unstated dependencies in 'tests' ... OK
* checking tests ... OK
  Running 'testthat.R'
* checking for unstated dependencies in vignettes ... OK
* checking package vignettes ... OK
* checking re-building of vignette outputs ... [241s] OK
* checking PDF version of manual ... [13s] OK
* checking HTML version of manual ... OK
* DONE
Status: 2 NOTEs



And my submission got cancelled automatically.  Can you tell me how to
solve such notes and how can i resubmit it to CRAN?

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]



More information about the R-package-devel mailing list