[R-pkg-devel] Compile issues on r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang with OpenMP

Kurt Hornik Kurt@Horn|k @end|ng |rom wu@@c@@t
Fri May 24 09:54:49 CEST 2024


>>>>> Dirk Eddelbuettel writes:

> On 23 May 2024 at 20:02, Ivan Krylov wrote:
> | On Wed, 22 May 2024 09:18:13 -0500
> | Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd using debian.org> wrote:
> | 
> | > Testing via 'nm' as you show is possible but not exactly 'portable'.
> | > So any suggestions as to what to condition on here?
> | 
> | (My apologies if you already got an answer from Kurt. I think we're not
> | seeing his mails to the list.)
> | 
> | Perhaps take the configure test a bit further and try to dyn.load() the
> | resulting shared object? To be extra sure, call the function that uses
> | the OpenMP features? (Some weird systems may have lazy binding enabled,
> | making dyn.load() succeed but crashing the process on invocation of a
> | missing function.)
> | 
> | On GNU/Linux, the linker will happily leave undefined symbols in when
> | creating a shared library (unlike on, say, Windows, where extern void
> | foo(void); foo(); is a link-time error unless an object file or an
> | import library providing foo() is also present). When loading such a
> | library, the operation fails unless the missing symbols are already
> | present in the address space of the process (e.g. from a different
> | shared library).
> | 
> | A fresh process of R built without OpenMP support will neither link in
> | the OpenMP runtime while running SHLIB nor have the OpenMP runtime
> | loaded and so should successfully fail the test.
> | 
> | I also wouldn't call the entry point "main" just in case some future
> | compiler considers this a violation of the rules™ [*] and breaks the
> | code. extern "C" void configtest(int*) would be compatible with .C()
> | without having to talk to R's memory manager:
> | 
> | # The configure script:
> | cat > test-omp.cpp <<EOF
> | #include <omp.h>
> | extern "C" void configtest(int * arg) {
> |   *arg = omp_get_num_threads();
> | }
> | EOF
> | # Without the following you're relying on the GNU/Linux-like behaviour
> | # w.r.t. undefined symbols (see WRE 1.2.1.1):
> | cat > Makevars <<EOF
> | PKG_CXXFLAGS = \$(SHLIB_OPENMP_CXXFLAGS)
> | PKG_LIBS = \$(SHLIB_OPENMP_CXXFLAGS)
> | EOF
> | R CMD SHLIB test-omp.cpp
> | 
> | # And then in R:
> | dyn.load(paste0("test-omp", .Platform$dynlib.ext))
> | # There's probably no need to test the return value, right?
> | .C("configtest", arg = integer(1))$arg

That seems a very nice way of following WRE's 

  If you do use your own checks, make sure that OpenMP support is
  complete by compiling and linking an OpenMP-using program

Modulo not hard-wiring 'R' in the configure code, and instead doing the
usual

  : ${R_HOME=`R RHOME`}
  if test -z "${R_HOME}"; then
    echo "could not determine R_HOME"
    exit 1
  fi
  
  "${R_HOME}/bin/R" CMD SHLIB .....

etc.

Best
-k

> Given that comes from RcppArmadillo we can rely on Rcpp::cppFunction() or
> Rcpp::sourceCpp() which should make that dance a little simpler.

> I had forgotten this was in fact a home-grown shell snippet (per `git blame`
> last polished by Kevin, now CC'ed, in 2020).  That should make an explicit
> load -- and noticing when we fail to load -- feasible.

> Maybe someone has time and appetite for contributing a PR?

> Cheers, Dirk

> | -- 
> | Best regards,
> | Ivan
> | 
> | [*]
> | In C++, main() is the function-that-must-not-be-named:
> | https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/main_function

> -- 
> dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd using debian.org



More information about the R-package-devel mailing list