[R-pkg-devel] Suggesting an archived package in the DESCRIPTION file
Duncan Murdoch
murdoch@dunc@n @end|ng |rom gm@||@com
Tue Mar 5 17:56:09 CET 2024
On 05/03/2024 8:02 a.m., Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 5 March 2024 at 06:25, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> | You could make a compatible version of `survivalmodels` available on a
> | non-CRAN website, and refer to that website in the
> | Additional_repositories field of DESCRIPTION.
>
> Every r-universe sub-site fits that requirement. For this package Google's
> first hit was https://raphaels1.r-universe.dev/survivalmodels and it carries
> the same line on install.packages() that Jeroen adds to every page:
>
> install.packages('survivalmodels', repos = c('https://raphaels1.r-universe.dev',
> 'https://cloud.r-project.org'))
I have mixed feelings about r-universe. On the one hand, it is really
nicely put together, and it offers the service described above. On the
other, it's probably a bad idea to follow its advice and use
install.packages() with `repos` as shown: that will install development
versions of packages, not releases.
Do you know if it's possible for a package to suggest the CRAN version
first, with an option like the above only offered as a pre-release option?
Duncan Murdoch
>
> So doing all three of
> - adding a line 'Additional_repositories: https://raphaels1.r-universe.dev'
> - adding a 'Suggests: survivalmodels;
> - ensuring conditional use only as Suggests != Depends
> should do.
>
> | It would be best if you fixed whatever issue caused survivalmodels to be
> | archived when you do this.
> |
> | Looking here:
> | https://cran-archive.r-project.org/web/checks/2024/2024-03-02_check_results_survivalmodels.html
> | that appears very easy to do. The source is here:
> | https://github.com/RaphaelS1/survivalmodels/ .
>
> The other may even take a PR fixing this going forward.
>
> Dirk
>
More information about the R-package-devel
mailing list