[R-pkg-devel] Suggesting an archived package in the DESCRIPTION file
Uwe Ligges
||gge@ @end|ng |rom @t@t|@t|k@tu-dortmund@de
Tue Mar 5 12:21:05 CET 2024
Suggested packages should be used conditionally. If available, use it,
otherwise the code should fail gracefully.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 05.03.2024 11:58, Yohann Foucher wrote:
> Dear R-Members,
>
>
> I just have submitted an update of the ‘survivalSL' package because the last version depends on the ‘survivalmodels’ package, which has been recently archived. In the DESCRIPTION file of the new version 0.93 of the ‘survivalSL' package, I've moved ‘survivalmodels' from "Depends" to the ‘Suggests'. I thought this would solve the problem. Indeed, the 'survivalSL’ package can function without the ‘survivalmodels’ package if the user does not include the related learner (survival neural network) in the learning ensemble. Nevertheless, the new version 0.93 was archived again.
>
> I’m working on the estimation of a survival neural network without the ‘survivalmodels’ package but this developments will take a long time. During this period, do you have any idea to avoid the archiving of my package?
>
> Thank you for your help.
>
>
> Yohann
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-package-devel using r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
More information about the R-package-devel
mailing list