[R-pkg-devel] Matrix and Mac OS

[Simon Urbanek]

Mikael,

in that case I think your requirements are wrong - Matrix says R >= 3.5.0 which is apparently incorrect - from what you say it should be 4.2.2?. I can certainly update to 4.2.3 if necessary.

Cheers,
Simon



> On 1/11/2023, at 9:19 AM, Mikael Jagan <jaganmn2 using gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Thanks.  We did see those ERRORs, stemming from use (since Matrix 1.6-0)
> of amsmath commands in Rd files.  These have been supported since R 4.2.2,
> but r-oldrel-macos-* (unlike r-oldrel-windows-*) continues to run R 4.2.0.
> My expectation was that those machines would begin running R >= 4.2.2 well
> before the R 4.4.0 release, but apparently that was wrong.
> 
> I am hesitant to complicate our Rd files with conditions on R versions
> only to support PDF output for R < 4.2.2, but maybe we can consider it
> for the Matrix 1.6-2 release if it is really a barrier for others ...
> 
> Mikael
> 
> On 2023-10-31 3:33 pm, Simon Urbanek wrote:
>> Mikael,
>> current Matrix fails checks on R-oldrel so that's why only the last working version is installed:
>> https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_Matrix.html
>> Cheers,
>> Simon
>>> On 1/11/2023, at 4:05 AM, Mikael Jagan <jaganmn2 using gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I am guessing that they mean EdSurvey:
>>> 
>>>    https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_EdSurvey.html
>>> 
>>> Probably Matrix 1.6-1.1 is not installed on r-oldrel-macos-arm64,
>>> even though it can be, because it was not released until R 4.3-z.
>>> 
>>> AFAIK, methods for 'qr' have not been touched since Matrix 1.6-0, and
>>> even those changes should have been backwards compatible, modulo handling
>>> of dimnames (class sparseQR gained a Dimnames slot in 1.6-0).
>>> 
>>> So I don't see a clear reason for requiring 1.6-1.1.  Requiring 1.6-0
>>> might make sense, if somehow EdSurvey depends on how class sparseQR
>>> preserves dimnames.  But IIRC our rev. dep. checks at that time did not
>>> reveal problems with EdSurvey.
>>> 
>>> Mikael
>>> 
>>> On 2023-10-31 7:00 am, r-package-devel-request using r-project.org wrote:
>>>> Paul,
>>>> can you give us a bit more detail? Which package, which build and where you got the errors? Older builds may not have the latest Matrix.
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Simon
>>>>> On 31/10/2023, at 11:26 AM, Bailey, Paul via R-package-devel<r-package-devel using r-project.org>  wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'm the maintainer for a few packages, one of which is currently failing CRAN checks on Mac OS because Matrix is not available in my required version (the latest). I had to fix a few things due to changes in the latest Matrix package because of how qr works and I thought, given the apparent API change, I should then require the latest version. My error is, "Package required and available but unsuitable version: 'Matrix'"
>>>>> 
>>>>> When I look at the NEWS in Matrix there is no mention of Mac OS issues, what the latest stable version of Matrix is, nor when a fix is expected. What version do MacOS version test Matrix with by default? Where is this documented? I assumes it always tested with the latest version on CRAN, so I'm a bit surprised. Or will this be resolved soon and I shouldn't bother CRAN maintainers with a new version of my package?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Paul
>>>>> 
>>>>> 	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>> 
>