[R-pkg-devel] How to update "SystemRequirements: C++11"?
Avraham Adler
@vr@h@m@@d|er @end|ng |rom gm@||@com
Tue Feb 7 01:21:56 CET 2023
On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 12:10 AM Iñaki Ucar <iucar using fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 7 Feb 2023 at 00:09, Avraham Adler <avraham.adler using gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > "If a package does have a src/Makevars[.win] file then also setting
> > the make variable ‘CXX_STD’ there is recommended,"
>
> That doesn't refer to the SystemRequirements field.
>
> Iñaki
>
No, but the prior sentence does. The complete excerpt is:
::Packages without a src/Makevars or src/Makefile file may specify a
C++ standard for code in the src directory by including something like
‘C++14’ in the ‘SystemRequirements’ field of the DESCRIPTION file,
e.g.
::::SystemRequirements: C++14
::If a package does have a src/Makevars[.win] file then also setting
the make variable ‘CXX_STD’ there is recommended, as it allows R CMD
SHLIB to work correctly in the package’s src directory.
So one is supposed to add the requirement to DESCRIPTION via
SystemRequitements. If there is a Makevars, one should ALSO set the
variable in there.
If you wish, I can forward you personal communication with Professor
Ripley from last week where he makes this clear as well.
Thanks,
Avi
> >
> > Avi
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 10:58 PM Iñaki Ucar <iucar using fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 6 Feb 2023 at 23:27, Avraham Adler <avraham.adler using gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 9:46 PM Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan using gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On 06/02/2023 4:01 p.m., Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> > > > > > On 06/02/2023 3:46 p.m., Winston Chang wrote:
> > > > > >> I recently submitted a package to CRAN with "SystemRequirements: C++11".
> > > > > >> This raises the following NOTE on R-devel, and I was asked to fix and
> > > > > >> resubmit:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> * checking C++ specification ... NOTE
> > > > > >> Specified C++11: please update to current default of C++17
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> If I understand correctly, I have two options, neither of which will work:
> > > > > >> 1. Remove "SystemRequirements: C++11" entirely. The problem with this is
> > > > > >> that on systems with older versions of R (3.6 and below, I believe), it may
> > > > > >> try to compile the package with an older C++ standard, which will fail.
> > > > > >> 2. Update it to "SystemRequirements: C++17". The problem here is that on
> > > > > >> systems that don't have a C++17 compiler, the package won't build -- even
> > > > > >> though the package only actually requires a C++11 compiler.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> How should I deal with this?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Are you allowed to say "C++11 or C++17"?
> > > > >
> > > > > Actually I can partially answer this: the test is not based on
> > > > > SystemRequirements, but on the log of the build, which now contains
> > > > > lines like this:
> > > > >
> > > > > using C compiler: ‘Apple clang version 12.0.0 (clang-1200.0.32.28)’
> > > > > using C++ compiler: ‘Apple clang version 12.0.0 (clang-1200.0.32.28)’
> > > > > using C++11
> > > > > using SDK: ‘MacOSX11.1.sdk’
> > > > >
> > > > > I get "using C++11" because of this line in Makevars:
> > > > >
> > > > > CXX_STD = CXX11
> > > > >
> > > > > So I guess the answer is to change your Makevars to make that line
> > > > > conditional on running under an old version of R. If you figure out how
> > > > > to do that, could you post the recipe here?
> > > >
> > > > I believe this is closely related to this email [1]. Dirk and I and
> > > > Aymeric have been going through the same issue with nloptr as well.
> > > > Our current opinion is to leave it out, as it would restrict more
> > > > users to demand C++17, which is unneeded, than to have users with over
> > > > a decade old compiler which does not have C++11. Dirk and Aymeric,
> > > > please chime in if I have misstated. Regardless, according to
> > > > Professor Ripley, if you require specific features, you should mark
> > > > them in _both_ Makevars and SystemRequirements, which is implied in
> > > > the "r-devel" version of WRE which adds the words "also" in section
> > > > 1.2.4.
> > >
> > > Could you please point to the specific passage? According to [1],
> > > section 1.2.4, declaring the C++ standard in SystemRequirements is
> > > only mandatory for C++17 or later.
> > >
> > > [1] https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-devel/R-exts.html#Using-C_002b_002b-code
> > >
> > > --
> > > Iñaki Úcar
>
>
>
> --
> Iñaki Úcar
More information about the R-package-devel
mailing list