[R-pkg-devel] Best way forward on a CRAN archived package

[Diego Hernangómez Herrero]

Thanks all for your answers. I resubmitted last week and the package is
back on CRAN :)

El El dom, 16 oct 2022 a las 18:34, Hadley Wickham <h.wickham using gmail.com>
escribió:

> I’d suggest resubmitting, after ensuring that R CMD  check runs without
> any notes, warnings, or errors.
>
> Hadley
>
>
> On Monday, October 10, 2022, Diego Hernangómez Herrero <
> diego.hernangomezherrero using gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi:
>>
>> I have some doubts on how to proceed in this case. I am the developer of
>> tidyterra, and I received an email from CRAN on 23Sep2022 about an issue
>> on
>> the package, setting a deadline on 07Oct2022 to correct it.
>>
>> I sent a patch that was accepted on CRAN on 29Sep2022, that fixed the
>> issue
>> (or at least I am pretty sure I solved it). I received no further feedback
>> by CRAN, so I assumed the package was safe. However it was finally
>> archived
>> on 07Oct2022.
>>
>> I have already sent an email to CRAN in order to check if they think the
>> issues still persist (or maybe they missed the patch submission?), but I
>> am
>> in a rush since there are other packages that depend on tidyterra and they
>> may be in risk of being archived on CRAN as well.
>>
>> So my question is: What is the best way forward at this point? Should I
>> wait to get some feedback from CRAN or is it best to resubmit the package
>> (I already have a new patch prepared)? I acknowledge that  "The time of
>> the
>> volunteers is CRAN’s most precious resource" so my goal is to reduce their
>> burden as much as possible.
>>
>> Kind regards
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>> Have a nice day!
>>
>>         [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>
>> ______________________________________________
>> R-package-devel using r-project.org mailing list
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>>
>
>
> --
> http://hadley.nz
>
-- 



Have a nice day!

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]