[R-pkg-devel] Slowdown running examples since 4.2 on Windows
Barbara Lerner
b|erner @end|ng |rom mtho|yoke@edu
Thu Jun 30 17:45:25 CEST 2022
Thanks for these suggestions. I attempted to submit a slightly earlier
version of my package a few weeks ago and saw the slowdown on winbuilder
then, too. I did not look into any further at that point.
I have tested it on a local Windows computer running 4.2.0 and I did not
see the slowdown there. Here are those results:
Name user system elapsed
prov.json 1.11 0.24 2.19
prov.run 0.99 0.06 1.93
version R version 4.2.0 (2022-04-22 ucrt)
os Windows 10 x64 (build 19044)
system x86_64, mingw32
Tomas Kalibera wrote on 6/30/22 10:09 AM:
>
> On 6/29/22 22:25, Barbara Lerner wrote:
>> I have a package that I want to submit an updated version for but the
>> examples run too slowly on win-builder since 4.2 came out. I just
>> submitted the exact same tar.gz file to all 3 versions of R available on
>> win-builder and got the results shown below. Notice the dramatic
>> slowdown from 4.1.3 to 4.2.1.
>>
>> I don't know how to go about tracking down the cause of this slowdown.
>> The examples are quite small. I am reluctant to use \dontrun, but I am
>> not sure what else to do.
>
> Could you perhaps submit to Winbuilder several times (with some
> non-trivial delay between the runs) to see if the very long execution
> is reproducible?
>
> If so, the next step could be trying on a Windows machine with
> interactive access, to reproduce, and if it is still so slow, checking
> where the time is spent, using an R profiler, using some C profiler
> (e.g. VerySleepy is free), comparing possibly to 4.1.3. It might be
> useful or necessary to also do the profiling with a debug build of
> Windows and/or the package, while the performance numbers will be
> skewed, one would see the symbol names.
>
> If you wanted specific help, please send a reproducible example -
> instructions how to run the code and which code.
>
> Best
> Tomas
>
>>
>> June 29 2:33 PM - old release
>> * using R version 4.1.3 (2022-03-10)
>> i386 timings
>> name user system elapsed
>> prov.json 3.28 0.33 5.19
>> prov.run 2.70 0.27 4.18
>>
>> x64 timings
>> name user system elapsed
>> prov.json 3.51 0.27 4.93
>> prov.run 3.05 0.28 4.48
>>
>>
>> June 29 2:19 PM - release
>> * using R version 4.2.1 (2022-06-23 ucrt)
>> * using platform: x86_64-w64-mingw32 (64-bit)
>> name user system elapsed
>> prov.json 16.98 8.81 26.82
>> prov.run 3.53 0.42 4.89
>>
>>
>> June 29 1:52 PM - devel
>> * using R Under development (unstable) (2022-06-28 r82534 ucrt)
>> * using platform: x86_64-w64-mingw32 (64-bit)
>> name user system elapsed
>> prov.json 16.60 9.09 26.66
>> prov.run 3.57 0.22 4.70 I then ran the same timing script as
>> win-builder uses on my Mac,
>> using Rscript and got these results: name user system elapsed
>> prov.json 1.105 0.159 1.329 prov.run 0.890 0.103
>> 1.053 session_info reports: version R version 4.2.0 (2022-04-22)
>> os macOS Catalina 10.15.7 system x86_64, darwin17.0 I then
>> installed 4.2.1 on my Mac. The time is a little slower but nothing like
>> the slowdown on Windows.
>> name user system elapsed prov.json 1.286 0.230 3.080
>> prov.run 0.940 0.108 1.131 version R version 4.2.1
>> (2022-06-23) os macOS Catalina 10.15.7 system x86_64,
>> darwin17.0
>>
--
<http://www.getpostbox.com>Barbara Lerner (she / her)
Professor
Computer Science Department
Mount Holyoke College
<http://www.getpostbox.com>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
More information about the R-package-devel
mailing list