[R-pkg-devel] Update of CRAN repository at win-builder r-devel?
Daniel Sjoberg
d@n|e|d@@joberg @end|ng |rom gm@||@com
Mon Feb 14 14:06:11 CET 2022
Thanks Duncan for the advice about the separate dev and production CRAN
systems. While the hardhat pkg was not available on Win Devel, I submitted
to CRAN last night and it was immediately accepted. Much appreciated!
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022, 7:19 AM Ian Lyttle <ijlyttle using me.com> wrote:
> I tried win-builder (r-devel) again today, everything works for me.
> Looking forward to a smooth CRAN submission.
>
> Thanks for the support and advice,
>
> Ian
>
>
> > On Feb 13, 2022, at 2:39 PM, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan using gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On 13/02/2022 2:33 p.m., Daniel Sjoberg wrote:
> >> Thank you so much for the response Duncan!
> >> How does one go about writing to CRAN?
> >
> > Ben gave you the address: cran using r-project.org.
> >> The package is tested and ready to be shipped to CRAN, but since it's
> failing on Win Devel, I assumed it would be auto-rejected if I submitted
> for a CRAN release.
> >
> > I think CRAN and Winbuilder are separate machines. If CRAN isn't showing
> errors in its tests of the hardhat package then it has probably
> successfully built it and will use it in tests. Currently it looks fine:
> >
> > https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_hardhat.html
> >
> > I do recommend testing on Windows R-devel on one of the other platforms
> I listed before submitting to CRAN. I don't think auto-rejects waste a lot
> of their time, but it's better to get accepted on the first try.
> >
> > Duncan Murdoch
> >
> >
> >
> >> On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 2:29 PM Duncan Murdoch <
> murdoch.duncan using gmail.com <mailto:murdoch.duncan using gmail.com>> wrote:
> >> I'd suggest writing to CRAN to point out that they may need to take a
> >> look, if you haven't already done so. In the meantime, you can test
> >> elsewhere (R-hub, Github, your own Windows machine or image, etc.)
> >> Duncan Murdoch
> >> On 13/02/2022 10:32 a.m., Daniel Sjoberg wrote:
> >> > Is there something wrong with the Windows Dev machine? It's now
> >> been 3
> >> > weeks since the release of the hardhat package v 0.2.0 on CRAN,
> >> and it's
> >> > still not available in the Win Dev check.
> >> >
> >> > I have this in my DESCRIPTION file:
> >> > Imports:
> >> > hardhat (>= 0.2.0)
> >> >
> >> > And still getting this note when running
> devtools::check_win_devel().
> >> >
> >> > Package required and available but unsuitable version: 'hardhat'
> >> >
> >> > https://cran.r-project.org/package=hardhat
> >> <https://cran.r-project.org/package=hardhat>
> >> >
> >> > Daniel
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 9:55 AM Daniel Sjoberg
> >> <danield.sjoberg using gmail.com <mailto:danield.sjoberg using gmail.com>>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> For what it's worth, I am seeing a similar issue.
> >> >>
> >> >> I am trying to make a release that depends on the hardhat
> >> package, which
> >> >> made a release on 2022-01-24, and it's still unavailable to
> check on
> >> >> WinDevel. I am also depending on the newest release of gtsummary
> >> which was
> >> >> made available on CRAN on 2022-01-29 (after hardhat's release).
> The
> >> >> gtsummary package, however, became available on WinDevel a few
> >> days later.
> >> >>
> >> >> Thank you,
> >> >> Daniel
> >> >>
> >> >> On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 9:06 AM Ian Lyttle <ijlyttle using me.com
> >> <mailto:ijlyttle using me.com>> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I am trying to check a package release-candidate on win-builder
> >> r-devel.
> >> >> This package imports a recently-released version of another
> package,
> >> >> {vegawidget}.
> >> >>> The check on win-builder (r-devel) fails:
> >> >>> * checking package dependencies ... ERROR
> >> >>> Package required and available but unsuitable version:
> 'vegawidget'
> >> >>> {vegawidget} 0.4.1 was released on CRAN on 2022-01-29, but is
> >> apparently
> >> >> not available to win-builder r-devel.
> >> >>> For what it’s worth, the check passes for win-builder r-release
> and
> >> >> r-oldrel.
> >> >>> Is this just a matter of me needing to be more patient, or
> >> could there
> >> >> be something “stuck” at win-builder?
> >> >>> Thanks!
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> >> >>>
> >> >>> ______________________________________________
> >> >>> R-package-devel using r-project.org
> >> <mailto:R-package-devel using r-project.org> mailing list
> >> >>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
> >> <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> >> >
> >> > ______________________________________________
> >> > R-package-devel using r-project.org
> >> <mailto:R-package-devel using r-project.org> mailing list
> >> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
> >> <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel>
> >
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-package-devel using r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
More information about the R-package-devel
mailing list