[R-pkg-devel] Failing vignette engine for package rasciidoc on solaris
Andreas Dominik Cullmann
|v@|rcu @end|ng |rom m@||box@org
Thu Dec 3 20:27:23 CET 2020
Dear Duncan,
thank you very much, saved my day!
Best,
Dominik
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 08:17:17, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 23/11/2020 7:07 a.m., Andreas Dominik Cullmann via R-package-devel wrote:
> > Dear List,
> > one of my packages, rasciidoc (a simple wrapper to 'knitr' and 'asciidoc'),
> > includes a minimal vigentte engine.
> > When submitting the package with a vignette using that engine, the vignette is
> > re-built on all platforms except for r-patched-solaris-x86:
> > https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_rasciidoc.html
> > https://www.r-project.org/nosvn/R.check/r-patched-solaris-x86/rasciidoc-00check.html
> >
> > Maybe rasciidoc's vignette engine is somewhat superfluous, but since it works
> > for all platforms except solaris, I kind of would like to use it.
> >
> > I cannot reproduce the error using rhub:
> > ## Test environments
> > - R-hub solaris-x86-patched-ods (r-release)
> > ## R CMD check results
> > ❯ On solaris-x86-patched-ods (r-release)
> > checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... WARNING
> > Maintainer: ‘Andreas Dominik Cullmann <fvafrcu using mailbox.org>’
> > Insufficient package version (submitted: 2.2.1, existing: 2.2.1)
> > Days since last update: 5
> > ❯ On solaris-x86-patched-ods (r-release)
> > checking top-level files ... NOTE
> > Files ‘README.md’ or ‘NEWS.md’ cannot be checked without ‘pandoc’ being installed.
> > ❯ On solaris-x86-patched-ods (r-release)
> > checking examples ... NOTE
> > Examples with CPU (user + system) or elapsed time > 5s
> > user system elapsed
> > rasciidoc 2.724 0.352 48.75
> > 0 errors ✔ | 1 warning ✖ | 2 notes ✖
> >
> >
> > And I happen to have no solaris box at hand for testing.
> > Does anybody have any suggestion on how I could tackle this?
>
> The error message says: "Can't find program `source-highlight`. Please
> install first (http://www.gnu.org/software/src-highlite/)." You have listed
> this in SystemRequirements as "recommended", but even if you had listed it
> as required, your build shouldn't fail if it is not found: it should test
> for that program, and continue on if it is not there. For example, it could
> output a vignette containing nothing except the warning message that
> source-highlight is needed to build the vignette. This is described in
> Section 1.6, "Writing portable packages", of Writing R Extensions.
>
> Duncan Murdoch
--
https://www.globalplanetauthority.com/
More information about the R-package-devel
mailing list