[R-pkg-devel] puzzling CRAN rejection

[Duncan Murdoch]

On 12/10/2020 6:14 p.m., Ben Bolker wrote:
> 
> 
>>
>> I'd say a mismatch in saved output isn't a small problem, it's either a
>> too-sensitive test or something serious.
>>
>> Duncan Murdoch
>>
> 
>     That's fair enough, but it would be nice if (1) this were a NOTE and

I don't think so.  As I said, I think it should be marked as an ERROR.

Duncan Murdoch

> (2) it were made explicit in the CRAN policy that, *except by special
> exception*, an unresolved NOTE is grounds for rejection.  This is
> broadly understood by experienced package maintainers but must sometimes
> come as a shock to newbies ...