[R-pkg-devel] Issue with submitting update of trelliscopejs to CRAN

Uwe Ligges ||gge@ @end|ng |rom @t@t|@t|k@tu-dortmund@de
Thu May 28 13:26:20 CEST 2020


Likely a false positive, we will accept this.

Best,
Uwe Ligges


On 28.05.2020 08:44, Ryan Hafen wrote:
> I submitted an update of trelliscopejs to CRAN a few days ago and received the following email:
> 
> Subject: [CRAN-pretest-archived] CRAN submission trelliscopejs 0.2.5
> 
> <<begin content>>
> 
> package trelliscopejs_0.2.5.tar.gz does not pass the incoming checks automatically, please see the following pre-tests:
> Windows: <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/trelliscopejs_0.2.5_20200525_203924/Windows/00check.log <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/trelliscopejs_0.2.5_20200525_203924/Windows/00check.log>>
> Status: OK
> Debian: <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/trelliscopejs_0.2.5_20200525_203924/Debian/00check.log <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/trelliscopejs_0.2.5_20200525_203924/Debian/00check.log>>
> Status: 1 NOTE
> 
> Last released version's CRAN status: ERROR: 5, OK: 7
> See: <https://CRAN.R-project.org/web/checks/check_results_trelliscopejs.html <https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_trelliscopejs.html>>
> 
> CRAN Web: <https://cran.r-project.org/package=trelliscopejs <https://cran.r-project.org/package=trelliscopejs>>
> 
> Please fix all problems and resubmit a fixed version via the webform.
> If you are not sure how to fix the problems shown, please ask for help on the R-package-devel mailing list:
> <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel>>
> If you are fairly certain the rejection is a false positive, please reply-all to this message and explain.
> 
> More details are given in the directory:
> <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/trelliscopejs_0.2.5_20200525_203924/ <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/trelliscopejs_0.2.5_20200525_203924/>>
> The files will be removed after roughly 7 days.
> 
> No strong reverse dependencies to be checked.
> 
> Best regards,
> CRAN teams' auto-check service
> Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-windows-ix86+x86_64
> Check: CRAN incoming feasibility, Result: Note_to_CRAN_maintainers
>   Maintainer: 'Ryan Hafen <rhafen using gmail.com <mailto:rhafen using gmail.com>>'
> 
> Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc
> Check: for detritus in the temp directory, Result: NOTE
>   Found the following files/directories:
>     'runtime-hornik’
> 
> <<end content>>
> 
> I can't reproduce this issue of the directory ‘runtime-hornik' in any of my testing environments. The last CRAN submission in February didn’t have this issue, and the updates in the current submission don’t have anything to do with the creation of files.
> 
> Any advice for how to proceed would be appreciated.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ryan
> 	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> 
> ______________________________________________
> R-package-devel using r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>



More information about the R-package-devel mailing list