[R-pkg-devel] Package submission failed with two warnings

[FARSHAD TABASINEJAD]

Hi Duncan,

I changed the version, recreated the package, and then tested it with the rhub::check_for_cran(). The function failed to create a summary for all the platform results together, however individual results are available in the following links.


https://builder.r-hub.io/status/Rpvt_0.1.1.tar.gz-5e89b16f7bfb420ebe310a57eb8357b3
https://artifacts.r-hub.io/Rpvt_0.1.1.tar.gz-5e89b16f7bfb420ebe310a57eb8357b3/
https://artifacts.r-hub.io/Rpvt_0.1.1.tar.gz-2ee682316e0f4bc7b09faf7a9e46b670/
https://builder.r-hub.io/status/original/Rpvt_0.1.1.tar.gz-08fc2dbd591f4d80b2e0049a7c8db8b8

you can also find the source code in the following link:
https://github.com/susaenergy/Rpvt

Thank you for the help!

Farshad


From: Duncan Murdoch
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2020 9:28 AM
To: FARSHAD TABASINEJAD; r-package-devel using r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Package submission failed with two warnings

For your first warning, see the CRAN policy:  "Updates to 
previously-published packages must have an increased version. Increasing 
the version number at each submission reduces confusion so is preferred 
even when a previous submission was not accepted."

For the second, it's hard to say what's happening.  Is your package 
online somewhere so we could try it on different machines?

Duncan Murdoch

On 15/05/2020 12:46 a.m., FARSHAD TABASINEJAD wrote:
> Dear R-package-devel experts,
> 
> This is the first time I’m writing to this platform about a package I recently submitted to CRAN (my first package).
> While the package is already available on CRAN, I still must fix a few warnings and one error as reported on the CRAN package check results page:
> https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_Rpvt.html
> 
> I recently resubmitted a modified version of the package to CRAN, however, it didn’t pass the automatic incoming checks.
> 
> Windows:  https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/Rpvt_0.1.0_20200512_051950/Windows/00check.log
> Status: 1 WARNING
> 
> Debian:  https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/Rpvt_0.1.0_20200512_051950/Debian/00check.log
> Status: 2 WARNINGs
> 
> 
> 1) The first warning that appears on both Windows and Debian results is “Insufficient package version (submitted: 0.1.0, existing: 0.1.0)”.
> 
> Since the package is conditionally available on CRAN, do I need to modify the package version to 0.1.1 to get rid of this warning?
> Is there any way to fix this problem with the current version of the package(0.1.0)?
> 
> 2) The second problem appears on the Debian test results:
>      
>      * checking re-building of vignette outputs ... [8s/8s] WARNING
>      
>      Error(s) in re-building vignettes:
>      ...
>      --- re-building ‘Rpvt.Rmd’ using rmarkdown
>      
>      pandoc-citeproc: Error in $: Incompatible API versions: encoded with [1,20] but attempted to decode with [1,17,5,4].
>      
>      CallStack (from HasCallStack):
>      error, called at ./Text/Pandoc/JSON.hs:111:48 in pandoc-types-1.17.5.4 5tHZ3B61A58JaKOMxwGQR4:Text.Pandoc.JSON
>      
>      Error running filter /usr/bin/pandoc-citeproc:
>      
>      Filter returned error status 1
>      Error: processing vignette 'Rpvt.Rmd' failed with diagnostics:
>      pandoc document conversion failed with error 83 ---
>      failed re-building ‘Rpvt.Rmd’
>      
>      SUMMARY: processing the following file failed:
>      ‘Rpvt.Rmd’
>      
>      Error: Vignette re-building failed.
>      Execution halted
> 
> I’ve created this package on a Windows operating system with no problem in creating the ‘Rpvt.Rmd’ file as is the case with the CRAN tests on x86_64-w64-mingw32 (64-bit).
> Why does it fail to create the “Rpvt.Rmd” file on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (Debian)? Is this something related to the citation style of the library.bib file that I’ve used in my vignettes folder? It is the “apa-6th-edition.csl” file downloaded from https://raw.githubusercontent.com/citation-style-language/styles/master/apa-6th-edition.csl
> 
> Thank you in advance!
> 
> Regards,
> Farshad
> 
> 
> 	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> 
> ______________________________________________
> R-package-devel using r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
> 



	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]