[R-pkg-devel] RES: RES: Time for CRAN response

[Tiago Olivoto]

Thanks, Duncan and Uwe, for the answers!
I'll resubmit it as soon as possible.
Best regards,
Tiago Olivoto

--
M.Sc. Tiago Olivoto
Doutorando em Agronomia
Departamento de Fitotecnia
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Av. Roraima, 1000, Camobi
Santa Maria, RS, 97105-340
E-mail: tiagoolivoto using gmail.com
Cel: +55 54 999187863
Research Gate
Currículo Lattes

-----Mensagem original-----
De: Uwe Ligges <ligges using statistik.tu-dortmund.de> 
Enviada em: domingo, 15 de dezembro de 2019 22:27
Para: Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan using gmail.com>; tiagoolivoto using gmail.com; r-package-devel using r-project.org
Assunto: Re: [R-pkg-devel] RES: Time for CRAN response



On 15.12.2019 23:39, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 15/12/2019 4:57 p.m., Tiago Olivoto wrote:
>> Thank you for the response.
>> As far I remember, I've responded that message by following the link 
>> and selecting "I have read the CRAN policies and would like to submit 
>> this package to CRAN" and " I have checked the submission using R CMD 
>> check --as-cran and a current version of r-devel, as mandated by the 
>> CRAN Repository Policy. (You could do so using the win-builder 
>> service at https://win-builder.r-project.org)", and then clicking on 
>> "upload package to CRAN"
>> These same steps were followed in the first submission, but at that 
>> time I received the following message that was not received in the 
>> last submission.
>>
>>> Dear maintainer,
>>>
>>> package metan_1.0.0.tar.gz has been auto-processed and is pending a 
>>> manual inspection of this new CRAN submission. A CRAN team member 
>>> will typically respond to you within the next 10 working days.
>>
>> Should I try to re-submit it again?
> 
> Probably.  I'd wait 24 hours, to see if someone from CRAN replies with 
> more information.
> 


Thanks, Duncan, here we got:

1. I did not spot a request for help from Nov 25 in the many messsages we receive. That one has now been answered.
2. I do not see a submission fom Nov 25. Can you simply resubmit and make sure you click on the confirmation link?

Best,
Uwe Ligges



> Duncan Murdoch
> 
>> Best,
>> Tiago Olivoto
>>
>>
>> -----Mensagem original-----
>> De: Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan using gmail.com> Enviada em: domingo, 15 
>> de dezembro de 2019 17:35
>> Para: tiagoolivoto using gmail.com; r-package-devel using r-project.org
>> Assunto: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Time for CRAN response
>>
>> On 15/12/2019 1:29 p.m., Tiago Olivoto wrote:
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> I've submitted my package 'metan' to CRAN for the first time a few 
>>> weeks ago and received some suggestions to improve the code. After 
>>> fixing some bugs, I've resubmitted it on November 25, but I still 
>>> don't have any response and the package was not found in incoming/ 
>>> dir on CRAN cran ftp site. Since it is my first experience, I would 
>>> like to have an idea about how long the CRAN team usually decides 
>>> about a package submission.
>>>
>>
>> If it is not in incoming/, something went wrong.  The most common 
>> thing to go wrong is that the maintainer didn't respond to the 
>> confirmation message. That message looks like this for a 
>> resubmission.  I assume first time submissions have a similar message:
>>
>>> Dear Duncan Murdoch
>>> Someone has submitted the package rgl to CRAN.
>>> You are receiving this email to confirm the submission as the 
>>> maintainer of this package.
>>> To confirm the submission to CRAN, follow or copy & paste the 
>>> following link into your browser:
>>> ...
>>
>>
>> When you confirm submission, you'll get another message that looks 
>> like
>> this:
>>
>>> [This was generated from CRAN.R-project.org/submit.html]
>>>
>>> The following package was uploaded to CRAN:
>>> ===========================================
>>>
>>> Package Information:
>>> Package: rgl
>>> Version: 0.100.26
>>   > ...
>>
>> After that, it goes into a queue for checking, and usually within a 
>> few days you'll be told about problems with it or it will be accepted 
>> to CRAN.  (Sometimes you'll be told very quickly, if the automated 
>> checks find a problem.)
>>
>> Duncan Murdoch
>>
> 
> ______________________________________________
> R-package-devel using r-project.org mailing list 
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel