[R-pkg-devel] Data docs

[Luis-Miguel Rodríguez Rojas]

Hello Duncan,

Thanks for your quick response!

I tried re-building and re-submitting and I'm still getting the same error:
https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/enveomics.R_1.5.0_20191026_224156/Windows/00check.log
https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/enveomics.R_1.5.0_20191026_224156/Debian/00check.log

I've made the tarball temporarily available directly in the repository in
case that helps at all:
https://github.com/lmrodriguezr/enveomics/blob/master/enveomics.R_1.5.0.tar.gz

Thanks a lot!
Miguel.

--
Luis M. Rodriguez-R, Ph.D.
[ https://rodriguez-r.com ]
---------------------------------
Research Engineer
Georgia Institute of Technology
311 Ferst Drive, ES&T, Room 3324
Atlanta, GA 30332, USA
[ http://enve-omics.gatech.edu/ ]



On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 1:39 PM Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan using gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 26/10/2019 11:39 a.m., Luis-Miguel Rodríguez Rojas wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I maintain a package that has data fields, and didn't have any problems
> > with this before. However, in my latest update, I'm getting the following
> > error message from the CRAN tests:
> >
> > Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-windows-ix86+x86_64
> > Check: for code/documentation mismatches, Result: WARNING
> >    Variables with usage in documentation object 'growth.curves' but not
> in
> > code:
> >      'growth.curves'
> >
> >    Variables with usage in documentation object 'phyla.counts' but not in
> > code:
> >      'phyla.counts'
>
> I'm not seeing those messages when testing your package in the same R
> version as win-builder used, so it could be a transient issue, or a
> problem with the tarball that you submitted.  In either case, I'd
> suggest just trying again:  rebuild and submit.
>
> Duncan Murdoch
>
> >
> > The variables are indeed NOT in the code, because they're only to be used
> > in the examples. In this version I moved my documentation from the old
> (now
> > defunct) inlinedocs to ROxygen2. In the previous form, I had to define a
> > structure in the code including both the function and the example, so
> > technically the code was using the variables. In the new form, I simply
> > define the examples with the @examples tag (that ends up in the .rd file
> > within an \examples{} block).
> >
> > Does anyone have any idea on how I should define data in the code to
> avoid
> > this issue? I could simply add the example lines after the return (so
> > they're never reached), but that sounds like a horrible hack.
> >
> > Just in case it's useful:
> > GitHub repository (inside the enveomics.R folder):
> > https://github.com/lmrodriguezr/enveomics/
> > Full test output:
> >
> https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/enveomics.R_1.5.0_20191026_032029/Windows/00check.log
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Miguel.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Luis M. Rodriguez-R, Ph.D.
> > [ https://rodriguez-r.com ]
> > ---------------------------------
> > Research Engineer
> > Georgia Institute of Technology
> > 311 Ferst Drive, ES&T, Room 3324
> > Atlanta, GA 30332, USA
> > [ http://enve-omics.gatech.edu/ ]
> >
> >       [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> >
> > ______________________________________________
> > R-package-devel using r-project.org mailing list
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
> >
>
>

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]