[R-pkg-devel] set pkg_config for 3rd party software
Martin Maechler
m@ech|er @end|ng |rom @t@t@m@th@ethz@ch
Fri Sep 6 11:21:09 CEST 2019
>>>>> Martin Maechler
>>>>> on Thu, 5 Sep 2019 18:36:03 +0200 writes:
>>>>> Dirk Eddelbuettel
>>>>> on Thu, 5 Sep 2019 10:14:21 -0500 writes:
>> On 5 September 2019 at 16:53, Ralf Stubner wrote:
>> | I don't know what is best, but here are three alternatives:
>> |
>> | * Use PKG_CHECK_MODULES which sets up default variables with _CFLAGS
>> | and _LIBS suffix after searching for a library with pkg-config, c.f.
>> | https://autotools.io/pkgconfig/pkg_check_modules.html
>> | * Call pkg-config by hand in configure.ac (and hence configure).
>> | Example: https://github.com/eddelbuettel/rcppredis/blob/master/configure.ac#L47-L60
>> | * Call pkg-config within an "Anticonf" configure script. Example:
>> | https://github.com/jeroen/curl/blob/master/configure#L16-L24
>> Make it four alternatives:
>> * Call pkg-config from an autoconf configure script. Examples:
>> edd using rob:~$ grep -l pkg-config git/*/configure.{ac,in}
>> git/libxls/configure.ac
>> git/nloptr/configure.ac
>> git/rcppmlpack2/configure.ac
>> git/rcppredis/configure.ac
>> git/rprotobuf/configure.ac
>> edd using rob:~$
>> I know all the cool kids these days hate autoconf, but it a) really is just
>> careful (and more portable) shell scripting (plus some extra glue). And it
>> b) avoids having users on some marginal OSs yell at you when they do not have
>> bash (just yesterday a Nix user had to comment on a five year old bug in that
>> is no longer valid as we went back to autoconf there too). As an extra bonus
>> it c) also works on Slowlaris.
>> Best, Dirk
> Thank you, Ralf, and Dirk.... that was very useful already !
> However, the real problem I am fighting still is not related to
> `pkg-config` and friends at all, but to the fact that my OS has
> a version of libmpfr in the main system library and that seems
> to be used in *any* case when the final <pkg>.so file is linked
> together:
> For me (on Fedora 30)
> $ R CMD config LDFLAGS
> -L/usr/lib64
> $ ls -l /usr/lib64/libmpfr*
> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 16 Feb 2 2019 /usr/lib64/libmpfr.so -> libmpfr.so.4.1.6
> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 16 Feb 2 2019 /usr/lib64/libmpfr.so.4 -> libmpfr.so.4.1.6
> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 827872 Feb 2 2019 /usr/lib64/libmpfr.so.4.1.6
> and for that reason, when R CMD INSTALL Rmpfr ...
> gets to the final linking, it uses
> gcc -shared -L/usr/lib64 -o Rmpfr.so Ops.o .... utils.o -L/usr/local.../mpfr/4.0.2/lib -lmpfr -lgmp
> and the early -L/usr/lib64 just "ensures" that my package lib
> (Rmpfr.so) is linked against /usr/lib64/libmpfr.so.4.1.6 which
> is old and I "hate" rather than against the much better
> libmpfr.so.6.0.2 which would be found in /usr/local.../mpfr/4.0.2/lib
> Yes, on a machine with root permission I can hack around to get
> what I want, but of course I'd really like 'R CMD INSTALL ..'
> to do the "right thing"
> just from my configure plus src/Makevars{.in} files.
> Yes, I tried 'LDFLAGS = ' (to set it to "empty") in
> src/Makevars* but that did not help either.
> Martin
I now finally did what most of us should do before posting here:
Carefully consulting the famous WRE "Writing R Extensions" R
Manual, notably the section ('1.2.1' currently),
named "Using Makevars" :
https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/R-exts.html#Using-Makevars
and came to the conclusion that at least for now,
I have to revert to using a 'src/Makefile' instead of just
Makevars files, the main reason being that R's own
<R>/etc/Makevars file is included *after* the package src/Makevars
file and so it does not help if I (un)set LDFLAGS in the latter.
Thank you for listening - it helped me to get to a more systematic
answer (and if you find that my conclusion has been wrong, I'm
happy to hear about that).
Martin
More information about the R-package-devel
mailing list