[R-pkg-devel] R CMD check --as-cran problem

Uwe Ligges ||gge@ @end|ng |rom @t@t|@t|k@tu-dortmund@de
Tue Jan 15 17:09:21 CET 2019



On 15.01.2019 17:06, Wang, Zhu wrote:
> I reinstalled Matrix and the installation was fine. But the same problem occurred, again only with --as-cran option. I propose to submit the package to CRAN and see how it goes. Please advise if you have different suggestions.


Please submit, I can only gues you have some strange env vars set...

Best,
Uwe Ligges


> Thanks,
> 
> Zhu
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Uwe Ligges [mailto:ligges using statistik.tu-dortmund.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 2:59 AM
> To: Wang, Zhu; Dirk Eddelbuettel
> Cc: Duncan Murdoch; r-package-devel using r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] R CMD check --as-cran problem
> 
> If this happens with the CRAN version of the package, you likely have a
> corrupted installtion of Matrix on your machine, please reinstall Matrix
> and try again. We all assumed your Matrix installation is fine.
> 
> Best,
> Uwe Ligges
> 
> 
> On 14.01.2019 23:36, Wang, Zhu wrote:
>> The source file is on a local computer, so I would not be able to send a link.
>>
>> Nevertheless, I downloaded a stable version at https://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/bujar_0.2-3.tar.gz, and attached results from
>>
>> R CMD check --as-cran
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Zhu
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Dirk Eddelbuettel <dirk.eddelbuettel using gmail.com> on behalf of Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd using debian.org>
>> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2019 4:19 PM
>> To: Wang, Zhu
>> Cc: Uwe Ligges; Dirk Eddelbuettel; Duncan Murdoch; r-package-devel using r-project.org
>> Subject: RE: [R-pkg-devel] R CMD check --as-cran problem
>>
>> On 14 January 2019 at 21:05, Wang, Zhu wrote:
>> | Apologize for multiple emails but my another email with source version of the package was hold waiting for moderator approval.
>>
>> I now formally rejected the post.
>>
>> Why? There is a reason there is a size limit there.  You were not asked to
>> send your sources, the comment approach is email a link to the repo.
>>
>> Dirk
>>
>> --
>> http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd using debian.org
>>
>>
>> 00check.log
>>
>> * using log directory ‘/media/zhu/easystore/backupdir/cygwin/home/Zwang/Rpkg/bujar.Rcheck’
>> * using R version 3.5.2 (2018-12-20)
>> * using platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (64-bit)
>> * using session charset: UTF-8
>> * using option ‘--as-cran’
>> * checking for file ‘bujar/DESCRIPTION’ ... OK
>> * checking extension type ... Package
>> * this is package ‘bujar’ version ‘0.2-3’
>> * checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... WARNING
>> Maintainer: ‘Zhu Wang <zwang using connecticutchildrens.org>’
>>
>> Insufficient package version (submitted: 0.2.3, existing: 0.2.3)
>>
>> The Date field is over a month old.
>>
>> This build time stamp is over a month old.
>> * checking package namespace information ... OK
>> * checking package dependencies ... OK
>> * checking if this is a source package ... OK
>> * checking if there is a namespace ... OK
>> * checking for executable files ... OK
>> * checking for hidden files and directories ... OK
>> * checking for portable file names ... OK
>> * checking for sufficient/correct file permissions ... OK
>> * checking serialization versions ... OK
>> * checking whether package ‘bujar’ can be installed ... ERROR
>> Installation failed.
>> See ‘/media/zhu/easystore/backupdir/cygwin/home/Zwang/Rpkg/bujar.Rcheck/00install.out’ for details.
>> * DONE
>> Status: 1 ERROR, 1 WARNING
>>



More information about the R-package-devel mailing list