[R-pkg-devel] Puzzled about "locked environments".
Martin Morgan
m@rtin@morg@n @ending from ro@wellp@rk@org
Mon Jul 9 01:42:59 CEST 2018
On 07/08/2018 07:23 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 08/07/2018 6:57 PM, Rolf Turner wrote:
>>
>> Recently I experimented with assigning a variable within the environment
>> of a function in a package that I am developing. Slightly more
>> explicitly:
>>
>> In a function "foo()" in the package, I have lines like:
>>
>> big <- 42
>> assign("big",big,envir=environment(bar))
>>
>> where "bar()" is another function in the package.
>>
>> This causes an error to be thrown:
>>
>>> Error in assign("big", big, envir = environment(bar)) :
>>> cannot add bindings to a locked environment
>>
>> The reason that I am puzzled about this is that I used this syntax
>> repeatedly in my CRAN package "AssetPricing". In this latter package
>> the syntax seems to work flawlessly. No errors are thrown. No mention
>> of "locked environments".
>>
>> Why would environments get "locked" in the package that I am currently
>> fooling about with, but not in the AssetPricing package? Is there
>> anything that I can do to keep environments from getting "locked"?
>
> It may be the timing. When R is installing a package, it executes all
> of the code in the .R files (which has been consolidated into one file,
> but that doesn't matter). This produces all of the objects and
> functions in the package.
>
> Then it locks the environment, so that things don't change.
>
> Then it compiles the functions. If they were allowed to change, then
> the compilation would have to be redone.
>
> So perhaps AssetPricing makes the change in the .R file, processed
> before locking, and your new package does it in a function, executed by
> the user after locking.
AssetPricing does, at least some of the time, in the body of a function
(the indentation is confusing)
environment(vupdate) <- new.env()
environment(scrG) <- new.env()
environment(initx) <- new.env()
environment(cev) <- new.env()
#
assign("dS",dS,envir=environment(vupdate))
assign("dS",dS,envir=environment(scrG))
assign("dS",dS,envir=environment(initx))
assign("dS",dS,envir=environment(cev))
so that assignment is to the unlocked new.env(). Presumably the new code
assigns to bar's original environment, which is the (locked, once the
package is loaded) package name space.
Martin Morgan
>
> Or maybe not.
>
> Duncan Murdoch
>
>>
>> Can anyone suggest where I should start looking for differences in the
>> nature of the two packages?
>>
>> I could possibly give more detail, but I have no idea as to what might
>> be relevant.
>>
>> One difference is that AssetPricing involves no dynamically loaded
>> Fortran code, whereas the package that I am currently fooling about with
>> *does* involve such code. (But neither "foo()" not "bar()" make direct
>> calls to .Fortran().)
>>
>> Grateful for any insights.
>>
>> cheers,
>>
>> Rolf Turner
>>
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-package-devel using r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
This email message may contain legally privileged and/or...{{dropped:2}}
More information about the R-package-devel
mailing list