Hi Boris,
yes I tried this way and it worked. The fact is that I wanted to be
compliant with the old code, I did not want to change anything. So I wanted
to find a new way to rewrite the code.
Thanks

~ Francesco Brundu


On 19 April 2014 23:18, Boris Steipe <boris.steipe@utoronto.ca> wrote:

> Have you looked at ?rainbow ?
> Is there a reason why you don't simply leave the gamma parameter away?
>
> Try:
> pie(rep(1,100), col=rainbow(100, s = 1.0, v = 0.75, start = 0.0, end =
> 0.75))
>
> Cheers,
> B.
>
>
> On 2014-04-19, at 6:05 AM, Francesco Brundu wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> > I am using an old code (probably written for R 2.5) and it stops when
> > calling rainbow() with gamma argument. I saw that gamma argument is not
> > present in newer version of R rainbow function. How can I translate this
> > line of code:
> >
> > rainbow(100, s = 1.0, v = 0.75, start = 0.0, end = 0.75, gamma = 1.5)
> >
> > ?
> >
> > It fails with:
> >
> > Error in rainbow(100, s = 1, v = 0.75, start = 0, end = 0.75, gamma =
> 1.5)
> > :
> >  unused argument (gamma = 1.5)
> > Calls: nmfconsensus ... matrix.abs.plot -> image -> image.default ->
> rainbow
> > Execution halted
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > ~ Francesco Brundu
> >
> >       [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> >
> > ______________________________________________
> > R-help@r-project.org mailing list
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> > PLEASE do read the posting guide
> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>
>

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]


