thanks


On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Greenberg, Jonathan <jgrn@illinois.edu>wrote:

> Hi Saptarshi:
>
> There are quite a few parallel mapply's out there -- my recommendation is
> to use the foreach package, since it allows you to be flexible in the
> parallel backend, and you don't have to write two statements (a sequential
> and a parallel statement) -- if a parallel backend is running, it will use
> that, otherwise it'll execute in sequential mode.
>
> --j
> ________________________________________
> From: r-help-bounces@r-project.org [r-help-bounces@r-project.org] on
> behalf of Saptarshi Guha [saptarshi.guha@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 1:24 PM
> To: R-help@r-project.org
> Subject: [R] Parallel version of Map(rather, mapply)
>
> Hello,
> I find Map to be nice interface to mapply. However
> Map calls mapply which in turn calls mapply via .Internal.
>
> Is there a parallel version of mapply (like mcapply) or do I need to write
> this myself?
>
> Regards
> Saptarshi
>
>         [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide
> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

