Hi Jean, thank-you again.

Both the assignment of names and the indices of the successful locations
worked perfectly.

Irucka Embry


<-----Original Message-----> 
>From: Adams, Jean [jvadams@usgs.gov]
>Sent: 12/28/2012 1:28:29 PM
>To: iruckaE@mail2world.com
>Cc: r-help@r-project.org
>Subject: Re: [R] comparison of large data set
>
>Irucka,
>
>
>You could assign names to the compare.all list .... for example ...
>
> names(compare.all) <- paste0("Obs", 1:54)
>
>Then, when you create the subset list, justbig, it will have the
appropriate names.
>
>
>
>If you just want to see the indices of the successful locations, you
could print
> (1:54)[compare.all > 0.7]
>
>
>Jean
>
>
>
>
>
>On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Irucka Embry <iruckaE@mail2world.com>
wrote:
>
>Hi Jean, thank-you.
>
>It was my fault on not ccing R-help on the previous correspondence.
With regards to the FALSE/TRUE or 
>0/1, you are right that they are the same logical identities, but it
better suits our original numerical data to 
>display 0s and 1s. 
>
>I want to thank you for correcting the 2 mistakes, the code works now.
>
>Is it possible to label each of the 54 matrices so that "justbig" lists
the 31 approved matrices along with 
>their name [whatever the name is for the 31 matrices out of the 54
total matrices]? For this code to be 
>fully applied to this project we have to know which site locations are
successful (> 0.7) and which ones 
>are not (< 0.7).
>
>Thank-you Jean.
>
>Irucka 


<span id=m2wTl><p><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2" style="font-size:13.5px">_______________________________________________________________<BR>Get the Free email that has everyone talking at <a href=http://www.mail2world.com target=new>http://www.mail2world.com</a><br>  <font color=#999999>Unlimited Email Storage &#150; POP3 &#150; Calendar &#150; SMS &#150; Translator &#150; Much More!</font></font></span>
	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]


