Mr ". .",

MASS::area comes to mind but it may be more helpful if you could say what
you are looking for / why integrate is not appropriate it is for whatever
you are doing.

Strictly speaking, I suppose there are all sorts of "alternatives" to
integrate() if you are willing to be really creative and build something
from scratch: diff(), cumsum(), lm(), hist(), t(), c(), ....

Michael Weylandt

On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 9:53 AM, B77S <bps0002@auburn.edu> wrote:

> package "caTools"
> see ?trapz
>
>
> . wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > is there any alternative to the function integrate?
> >
> > Any comments are welcome.
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > ______________________________________________
> > R-help@r-project.org mailing list
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> > PLEASE do read the posting guide
> > http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Alternatives-to-integrate-tp3783624p3783645.html
> Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide
> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

