Frankly, the built-in R editor for OS X is far better than the built-in
editor for Windows, in my opinion having used both. I've never found the
need for something like TinnR on the Mac side-- but I have used TextWrangler
on occasion and enjoyed the syntax highlighting, line numbering, etc.

http://www.barebones.com/products/textwrangler/

---------------------------------------
David L. Van Brunt, Ph.D.
mailto:dlvanbrunt@gmail.com


On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Marc Schwartz <marc_schwartz@me.com>wrote:

> On Dec 16, 2010, at 9:41 AM, Troels Ring wrote:
>
> > Dear friends - I'm using Tinn-R in Windows and find it OK. My son is
> running MacOS and is just starting using R and I know nothing about MacOS
> and R but we seem to have difficulties in finding something similar to Tinn
> for MaC. What are your suggestions?
> > Thanks a lot!
> > Troels Ring, MD
> > Aalborg, Denmark
>
>
> I have not used Tinn-R, so can't speak for specific functions. That being
> said, Emacs/ESS is perhaps the most conceptually similar environment. It is
> also portable across Windows, OSX and Linux, which can provide consistency
> advantages if supporting multiple platforms.
>
> Vincent Goulet has made it easy to install for OSX with a binary image.
> More info here:
>
>  http://vgoulet.act.ulaval.ca/en/ressources/emacs/mac
>
> He also has a Windows installer here:
>
>  http://vgoulet.act.ulaval.ca/en/ressources/emacs/windows
>
>
> Further OSX specific queries are also best posted to:
>
>  https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mac
>
> HTH,
>
> Marc Schwartz
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide
> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

