I have a data with binary response variable, repcnd (pregnant or not) and one predictor continuous variable, svl (body size) as shown below. I did Hosmer-Lemeshow test as a goodness of fit (as suggested by a kind “R-helper” previously). To test whether the predictor (svl, or body size) has significant effect on predicting whether or not a female snake is pregnant, I used the differences between null deviance and residual deviance using a code as following:

 
1-pchisq(mod.fit$null.deviance - mod.fit$deviance, mod.fit$df.null - mod.fit$df.residual)
 
Could anyone tell me whether I did the test properly? I did this test because I thought Wald test/z score listed in the output from "summary(mod.fit)" is not appropriate for a kind of data I have.  Does R have automated function to run appropriate tests? I have pasted my R output below.
 
Thank you in advance for your time and help.
 
Kiyoshi
 
 
            repcnd             svl
1          1                      51.5
2          1                      52.5
<edited>
294      0                      59.8
298      1                      60.0
300      1                      51.7
301      1                      57.4
302      1                      60.9
303      0                      56.8
304      0                      50.0
-------------------
> mod.fit <- glm(formula = gb.no.M$repcnd ~ gb.no.M$svl, family = binomial(link = logit), data = gb.no.M, na.action = na.exclude, control = list(epsilon = 0.0001, maxit = 50, trace = F))
> summary(mod.fit)
 
Call:
glm(formula = gb.no.M$repcnd ~ gb.no.M$svl, family = binomial(link = logit), 
    data = gb.no.M, na.action = na.exclude, control = list(epsilon = 1e-04, 
        maxit = 50, trace = F))
 
Deviance Residuals: 
   Min      1Q  Median      3Q     Max  
-1.757  -1.109   0.734   1.113   1.632  
 
Coefficients:
            Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|)    
(Intercept) -7.08565    1.84106  -3.849 0.000119 ***
gb.no.M$svl  0.13529    0.03474   3.894 9.85e-05 ***
---
Signif. codes:  0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 
 
(Dispersion parameter for binomial family taken to be 1)
 
    Null deviance: 301.92  on 217  degrees of freedom
Residual deviance: 285.04  on 216  degrees of freedom
  (8 observations deleted due to missingness)
AIC: 289.04
 
Number of Fisher Scoring iterations: 3
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Hosmer-Lemeshow test
> 
> hosmerlem <- function (y, yhat, g = 10) 
+ {
+ cutyhat <- cut(yhat, breaks = quantile(yhat, probs = seq(0, 1, 1/g)), include.lowest = T)
+ obs <- xtabs(cbind(1 - y, y) ~ cutyhat)
+ expect <- xtabs(cbind(1 - yhat, yhat) ~ cutyhat)
+  chisq <- sum((obs - expect)^2/expect)
+ P <- 1 - pchisq(chisq, g - 2)
+ c("X^2" = chisq, Df = g - 2, "P(>Chi)" = P)
+ }
> 
> mod.fit <- glm(formula = no.NA$repcnd ~  no.NA$svl, family = binomial(link = logit), data =  no.NA, na.action = na.exclude, control = list(epsilon = 0.0001, maxit = 50, trace = F))
 
> hosmerlem(no.NA$repcnd, fitted(mod.fit))
      X^2        Df   P(>Chi) 
6.8742531 8.0000000 0.5502587
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> list(p.value = round(1-pchisq(mod.fit$null.deviance - mod.fit$deviance,
+ mod.fit$df.null- mod.fit$df.residual),6), 
+ df = mod.fit$df.null- mod.fit$df.residual,
+ change = mod.fit$null.deviance - mod.fit$deviance)
 
$p.value
[1] 4e-05
 
$df
[1] 1
 
$change
[1] 16.87895


      
	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

