Regarding R and REvolution, there was a post published recently comparing
the two:
http://www.r-bloggers.com/comparing-standard-r-with-revoutions-for-performance/

Regarding the rest, I don't know...

Tal


----------------Contact
Details:-------------------------------------------------------
Contact me: Tal.Galili@gmail.com |  972-52-7275845
Read me: www.talgalili.com (Hebrew) | www.biostatistics.co.il (Hebrew) |
www.r-statistics.com (English)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 4:39 PM, skan <juanpide@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Hello
>
> How do you compare R to SAS in terms of speed and management of large
> datasets?
>
> What about Revolution R?
> I've seen on their site, they claim that Revolution R is much faster than R
> and it's multithread...
> Can you really notice the difference?. What dissadvantage does it have?
> I think it's based on R 2.10.   but R  already issued the version 2.12
>
>
> Regards
>
>
>
> What alternative to R would you use in order to merge asynchronus time
> series?. SAS, Stata, eViews...?
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/R-vs-SAS-and-Revolution-R-tp2261149p2261149.html
> Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide
> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

