Hello All,

Does anyone know why length(fit1$time) < length(fit2$n) in survfit.coxph
output? Why is the predicted time length is not the same as the number of
samples (n)?

I tried: example(survfit.coxph).

Thanks,
parmee

> fit2$n
[1] 241

> fit2$time
  [1]     0    31    32    60    61   152   153   174   273   277   362
365   499   517   518   547
 [17]   566   638   700   760   791   792   809   822   845   944  1005
 1077  1116  1125  1218  1369
 [33]  1392  1400  1431  1492  1625  1642  1673  1674  1706  1766  1767
 1795  1815  1826  1851  1857
 [49]  2006  2010  2070  2084  2099  2121  2160  2191  2223  2230  2236
 2314  2345  2400  2422  2434
 [65]  2435  2495  2556  2557  2587  2588  2678  2802  2815  2833  2844
 2860  2861  2910  2922  2953
 [81]  2989  3010  3012  3014  3091  3167  3186  3226  3227  3242  3318
 3346  3380  3448  3560  3561
 [97]  3590  3773  3775  3805  3837  3895  3932  3943  3962  3987  4119
 4139  4201  4206  4224  4232
[113]  4249  4321  4370  4453  4536  4539  4627  4656  4758  4763  4810
 4939  4959  4962  5024  5047
[129]  5068  5088  5181  5216  5236  5308  5354  5384  5550  5757  5789
 5796  5824  5917  5930  5934
[145]  6008  6025  6089  6117  6126  6143  6155  6209  6256  6349  6479
 6607  6626  6642  6723  6760
[161]  6763  6789  6800  6878  6931  6970  7003  7065  7085  7093  7160
 7184  7198  7247  7280  7288
[177]  7301  7364  7370  7381  7397  7410  7417  7470  7479  7519  7533
 7545  7555  7668  7732  7736
[193]  7758  7807  7862  7867  7875  7884  7899  7911  7954  7958  7965
 8006  8009  8023  8030  8080
[209]  8100  8133  8165  8308  8327  8381  8389  8569  8600  8697  8761
 8806  8887  8961  9257  9510
[225]  9560  9598  9993 10122 10359 12457

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

